ArticleCommunications biology2025
So close yet so far apart: distinct flanking sequence recognition by DNMT3A and DNMT3B.
Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
DNMT3A and DNMT3B are closely related DNA methyltransferases that catalyze de novo CpG methylation and have distinct preferences for flanking sequences. Despite sharing 91% sequence similarity within their catalytic domains, these paralogs show non-overlapping genomic targeting and divergent biological roles. To uncover the mechanistic basis of this specificity, we performed 16µs of all-atom molecular dynamics simulations on DNMT3A and DNMT3B complexes bound to CpG substrates with varied +2 flanking bases (i.e., CGX). To resolve their base- and shape-readout mechanisms at atomistic detail, we introduced a Comparative Dynamics Analysis (CDA) framework. Our CDA approach revealed that DNMT3A relies on a rigid, sequence-specific hydrogen bonding network and shape-constrained electrostatic anchoring, whereas DNMT3B employs a more flexible and distributed interface, allowing broader substrate tolerance. This represents the first systematic analysis of shape readout in DNMT3 enzymes and demonstrates how flanking sequence specificity is dynamically encoded by two nearly identical proteins. Our findings not only clarify how closely related DNA-modifying enzymes diverge in recognition strategies, but also lay the foundation for future efforts to engineer paralog-specific protein-DNA interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.