ArticleScientific reports2025
Using large language models for enhanced fraud analysis and detection in blockchain based health insurance claims.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Economic impact of health insurance fraud, waste, and abuse: a literature review of direct and indirect costs and system sustainability.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- A collaboration mechanism for medical insurance settlement based on isolation forest and Fleiss kappa smart contract.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Marketing-AutoM3L: domain-aware automated machine learning for financial customer analytics.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traditional health insurance claim processing systems are plagued by inefficiencies and vulnerabilities, often resulting in significant financial losses due to fraudulent activities. Existing fraud detection methods are largely manual, time-consuming, and inadequate for handling the complexity and scale of modern fraudulent schemes. Moreover, the trust-based relationships between insurers and healthcare providers lack mechanisms to ensure data integrity and prevent manipulation. While several blockchain-based systems have been proposed to improve transparency and tamper resistance, they typically focus on structured data and predefined fraud types, offering limited adaptability and analytical insight. This paper proposes a novel solution leveraging blockchain technology and Large Language Models (LLMs) to transform fraud detection. The system uses Ethereum smart contracts (SCs) to securely store medical records and claim details on a decentralized, tamper-proof ledger that ensures data integrity, traceability, and accountability. This immutable data is accessed by an LLM via a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) system, which enables intelligent retrieval and analysis of relevant clinical information to detect fraud patterns and inconsistencies. To support complex scenarios involving free-text documents, unstructured clinical data, such as lab reports, are stored using decentralized off-chain storage and retrieved during LLM analysis. In addition, an LLM-powered chatbot also allows insurance providers to interact with the system in natural language for claim inquiries, explanations, and summaries. The architecture, sequence diagrams, and implementation algorithms outline the development process, while testing scenarios demonstrate the system's ability to detect fraud such as inflated costs, unnecessary treatments, and unrendered services. Evaluation using both synthetic and public clinical datasets showed strong performance, with the LLM achieving up to 99% fraud detection accuracy. Cost, security, and scalability analyses confirm the system's practicality and resilience, with the complete detection process executing in just 13 seconds. By overcoming the limitations of traditional systems, this framework offers a scalable and adaptable approach for healthcare and other domains. The SCs and source code are publicly available on GitHub.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.