Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40804281›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

XGBoost models based on non imaging features for the prediction of mild cognitive impairment in older adults.

Miguel A Fernández-Blázquez, José M Ruiz-Sánchez de León, Rubén Sanz-Blasco, Emilio Verche, Marina Ávila-Villanueva, María José Gil-Moreno, Mercedes Montenegro-Peña, Carmen Terrón, Cristina Fernández-García, Jaime Gómez-Ramírez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. [Development of a machine learning-based model for assessing pulmonary function in elderly patients].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Miguel A Fernández-BlázquezDepartment of Biological and Health Psychology, School of Psychology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, C/ Iván Pavlov, 6, Madrid, 28049, Spain. miguelangel.fernandezb@uam.es.
José M Ruiz-Sánchez de LeónDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Cognitive Processes and Speech Therapy, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Rubén Sanz-BlascoDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Cognitive Processes and Speech Therapy, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Emilio VercheDepartment of Psychobiology and Methodology in Behavioural Sciences, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Marina Ávila-VillanuevaDepartment of Biological and Health Psychology, School of Psychology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, C/ Iván Pavlov, 6, Madrid, 28049, Spain.
María José Gil-MorenoHealth Research Institute of the San Carlos Clinic Hospital (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain.
Mercedes Montenegro-PeñaDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Cognitive Processes and Speech Therapy, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Carmen TerrónNuestra Señora del Rosario University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Cristina Fernández-GarcíaCognitive Impairment Unit, Neurology Service, Sanitas La Moraleja University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Jaime Gómez-RamírezPsychophysiology and Neuroimaging Group, Institute of Biomedical Research Cadiz (INiBICA), Cadiz, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global increase in dementia cases highlights the importance of early detection and intervention, particularly for individuals at risk of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), a precursor to dementia. The aim of this study is to develop and validate machine learning (ML) models based on non-imaging features to predict the risk of MCI conversion in cognitively healthy older adults over a three-year period. Using data from 845 participants aged 65 to 87 years, we built five eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) models of increasing complexity, incorporating demographic, self-reported, medical, and cognitive variables. The models were trained and evaluated using robust preprocessing techniques, including multiple imputation for missing data, Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) for class balancing, and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) for interpretability. Model performance improved with the inclusion of cognitive assessments, with the most comprehensive model (Model 5) achieving the highest accuracy (86%) and area under the curve (AUC = 0.8359). Feature importance analysis revealed that variables such as memory tests, depressive symptoms, and age were significant predictors of MCI conversion. In addition, an online risk calculator has been developed and made available free of charge to facilitate clinical use and provide a practical, cost-effective tool for early detection in diverse healthcare settings ( https://aimar-project.shinyapps.io/MCI-risk-calculator/ ). This study highlights the potential of non-imaging ML models for early detection of MCI and emphasizes their accessibility and clinical utility. Future research should focus on validating these models in different populations and examining their integration with personalized intervention strategies to reduce dementia risk.

Indexed as

Boosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsCognitive DysfunctionAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleAgingDementiaEarly diagnosisMachine learningMil cognitive impairmentXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID40804281
PMCPMC12350651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.