Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40804280›Full record

ReviewCommunications biology2025

Pathfinding: a neurodynamical account of intuition.

Steven Kotler, Michael Mannino, Karl Friston, Gyorgy Buzsáki, J A Scott Kelso, Guillaume Dumas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Steven KotlerFlow Research Collective, Gardnerville, NV, USA.
Michael ManninoFlow Research Collective, Gardnerville, NV, USA.
Karl FristonUniversity College London, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7984-8909
Gyorgy BuzsákiDepartment of Neuroscience and Physiology, Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York City, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3100-4800
J A Scott KelsoCenter for Complex Systems and Brain Sciences, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7740-2487
Guillaume DumasCHU Sainte-Justine Azrieli Research Centre, Department of Psychiatry and Addictology, University of Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada. guillaume.dumas@umontreal.ca.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examine the neurobiology of intuition, a term often inconsistently defined in scientific literature. While researchers generally agree that intuition represents "an experienced-based process resulting in a spontaneous tendency toward a hunch or hypothesis," we establish a firmer neurobiological foundation by framing intuition evolutionarily as a pathfinding mechanism emerging from the brain's optimization of its relationship with the environment. Our review synthesizes empirical findings on intuition's neurobiological basis, including relevant brain networks and their relationship to cognitive states like insight. We propose that unsolved problems dynamically alter attractor landscapes, guiding future intuitions. We investigate "opportunistic assimilation" through nonlinear neurodynamics and identify hippocampal sharp wave ripples as potential neural correlates of intuition, citing their role in creativity, choice, action planning, and abstract thinking. Finally, we explore intuition through two complementary perspectives: the free energy principle, which models brains as minimizing uncertainty through predictive hierarchical coding, and metastable coordination dynamics, describing the brain's simultaneous tendencies toward regional cooperation and functional autonomy. Together, these principles provide a comprehensive neurodynamical account of intuition's neurophenomenology.

Indexed as

BrainIntuitionAnimalsCognitionHumansModels, Neurological

Identifiers

PMID40804280
PMCPMC12350660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.