ArticleScientific reports2025
Identifying key factors for organizational resilience among medical alliance using the analytic hierarchy process method.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to assess organizational resilience within medical alliances using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method, identify key factors, and improve their performance. It developed a model of organizational resilience factors for medical alliances, including 5 first-level sub-criteria, 15 second-level sub-criteria, and 43 third-level sub-criteria based on literature reviews and expert assessments. Nineteen experts from universities, health commissions, centers for disease control and preventions, and hospitals, including both management and technical specialists, were invited. AHP was utilized to calculate and prioritize the weights for each criterion of organizational resilience. A4 Integrated and A2 Self-regulating were identified as the key first-level sub-criteria for organizational resilience among medical alliances. In the third-level sub-criteria, the top three most important factors were C10 Leadership at the Decision-Making Level of the Medical Alliance (0.050), C29 Funds of the Medical Alliance Jointly Negotiated and Allocated by the Township Hospital and Each Branch Hospital (0.048), and C33 Integration of Medical and Preventive Services in the Medical Alliance (0.041). Sensitivity analysis was also conducted to check the stability of our results. In conclusion, this study offers a comprehensive evaluation tool for assessing the organizational resilience of medical alliances. It suggests that enhancing integration and self-regulation can improve both the operational effectiveness and service quality of medical alliances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.