Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40804241›Full record

ArticleNPJ vaccines2025

A platform approach as a plausible option for nonclinical safety assessment of adjuvanted vaccines.

Eric Destexhe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ vaccines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Eric DestexheGSK, Rue de l'Institut 89, 1330, Rixensart, Belgium. eric.x.destexhe@gsk.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccine platform technologies are reproducible, standardized manufacturing and development methods that may be leveraged to streamline regulatory approval of new vaccines. To evaluate the plausibility of a platform approach for the nonclinical safety assessment of adjuvanted recombinant-protein vaccine candidates, a comparative analysis was performed on repeat-dose toxicity data of four AS01 adjuvanted candidate vaccines from five rabbit studies. Groups of animals received AS01-adjuvanted vaccines, AS01 alone, or antigens alone on multiple occasions. All vaccines were well-tolerated, showing mainly transient signs of inflammation after the administrations, consistent across all vaccines and similar to AS01. The antigens alone induced only minimal signs of inflammation, indicating that AS01 mainly drives the innate immune response. These findings support the plausibility of a platform approach for the nonclinical safety assessment of adjuvanted vaccines, potentially reducing animal use and expediting first-in-human trials by streamlining or eliminating some nonclinical studies.

Identifiers

PMID40804241
PMCPMC12350924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.