Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40804220›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical review2025

Consistency and grade prediction of intracranial meningiomas based on fractal geometry analysis.

Balázs Markia, Tamás Mezei, János Báskay, Péter Pollner, Adrienn Mátyás, Ákos Simon, Péter Várallyay, Péter Banczerowski, Loránd Erőss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Balázs MarkiaClinic of Neurosurgery and Neurointervention, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Tamás MezeiClinic of Neurosurgery and Neurointervention, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary. mezei.tamas@semmelweis.hu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0848-1182
János BáskayData-Driven Health Division of National Laboratory for Health Security, Health Services Management Training Centre, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Péter PollnerData-Driven Health Division of National Laboratory for Health Security, Health Services Management Training Centre, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary. pollner.peter@emk.semmelweis.hu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0464-4893
Adrienn MátyásDepartment of Neurosurgery, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Ákos SimonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Péter VárallyayClinic of Neurosurgery and Neurointervention, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Péter BanczerowskiClinic of Neurosurgery and Neurointervention, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Loránd ErőssClinic of Neurosurgery and Neurointervention, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meningiomas are the most common primary tumors in the central nervous system. Surgical resection remains the main treatment option, often resulting in a curative outcome; however, careful preoperative planning is essential. One of the primary concerns for neurosurgeons treating meningiomas is tumor consistency, as this has a significantly impact on the likelihood of complete resection. Predicting the consistency and histology of a meningioma prior to surgery is valuable for selecting the appropriate surgical instruments and planning the approach. We conducted a retrospective study to analyze clinical data and preoperative MRI images of patients who underwent surgery for intracranial meningiomas. T1, T1c, T2, and FLAIR sequences were obtained for all patients. Surgical notes were reviewed to assess tumor consistency. Tumor segmentation was performed using ITK-SNAP software. Fractal analysis and statistical analyses were made, including t-tests, Fisher's exact tests, logistic regression, and ROC analysis. Forty-eight patients met the selection criteria. For prediction of consistency when only fractal parameters were used, lacunarity index was able to discriminate between soft and hard consistency with an AUC value of 0.745 (95% CI: 0.538-0.958). When tumor homogeneity was added, these values changed to 0.763 (95% CI: 0.518-1.000). For prediction of histological grade, an AUC value of 0.697 (95% CI: 0.490-0.952) was found, using only fractal dimension. When age, tumor homogeneity and volume parameters were added, this value increased to 0.841 (95% CI: 0.625-1.000). Our study suggests that fractal metrics are useful tools for preoperative estimation of tumor consistency and histological grading.

Indexed as

FractalsMeningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaAdultAgedFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingRetrospective StudiesFractal geometry analysisHistologyMeningiomaPredictionRadiomicsTumor consistency

Identifiers

PMID40804220
PMCPMC12350593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.