ArticleNeurosurgical review2025
Consistency and grade prediction of intracranial meningiomas based on fractal geometry analysis.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterizing Visual Neurosurgical Expertise in Brain MRI Visualization Using Eye-Tracking and 3D Fractal Dimension Analysis.Journal of eye movement research · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Meningiomas are the most common primary tumors in the central nervous system. Surgical resection remains the main treatment option, often resulting in a curative outcome; however, careful preoperative planning is essential. One of the primary concerns for neurosurgeons treating meningiomas is tumor consistency, as this has a significantly impact on the likelihood of complete resection. Predicting the consistency and histology of a meningioma prior to surgery is valuable for selecting the appropriate surgical instruments and planning the approach. We conducted a retrospective study to analyze clinical data and preoperative MRI images of patients who underwent surgery for intracranial meningiomas. T1, T1c, T2, and FLAIR sequences were obtained for all patients. Surgical notes were reviewed to assess tumor consistency. Tumor segmentation was performed using ITK-SNAP software. Fractal analysis and statistical analyses were made, including t-tests, Fisher's exact tests, logistic regression, and ROC analysis. Forty-eight patients met the selection criteria. For prediction of consistency when only fractal parameters were used, lacunarity index was able to discriminate between soft and hard consistency with an AUC value of 0.745 (95% CI: 0.538-0.958). When tumor homogeneity was added, these values changed to 0.763 (95% CI: 0.518-1.000). For prediction of histological grade, an AUC value of 0.697 (95% CI: 0.490-0.952) was found, using only fractal dimension. When age, tumor homogeneity and volume parameters were added, this value increased to 0.841 (95% CI: 0.625-1.000). Our study suggests that fractal metrics are useful tools for preoperative estimation of tumor consistency and histological grading.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.