ReviewBehavior research methods2025
A compendium of considerations for methods in motion-induced blindness research.
Review in Behavior research methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ever since its introduction to vision research by Bonneh and colleagues in 2001, motion-induced blindness (MIB) has spawned a great deal of scholarly activity. However, an investigation of the common methods used for the MIB task indicates several issues, including a trend of newer studies simply replicating methodologies from earlier works, ambiguity regarding what the most optimal methods are for the MIB task, and the exclusion by MIB studies of crucial details regarding the MIB task. These issues are the consequence of the past two decades of MIB research having transpired without an updated set of guidelines and considerations regarding the use of the MIB task. Therefore, we aim to review the prevalent research methods in MIB studies, shed light on overlooked implications associated with these methodologies and configurations, and highlight innovative and effective approaches to MIB-related data collection. Discussions are supported using insights from both past MIB studies and new empirical findings of the present study. Aspects of MIB research that have been covered include managing individual differences, participant fatigue, fixation, response collection methods, defining target disappearance, target positioning, and the appearance of a MIB display's constituent elements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40804191What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.