ArticleScientific reports2025
A deep learning framework for bone fragment classification in owl pellets using YOLOv12.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Non-invasive monitoring of small mammal populations is critical for both biodiversity conservation and integrated pest management, particularly in agroecosystems. Barn owl (Tyto alba) pellet analysis has long served as a valuable tool for inferring prey abundance, yet conventional bone classification is labour-intensive and requires specialized expertise. Here, we introduce a deep learning framework that automates the detection and classification of rodent bone fragments from owl pellets using the YOLOv12 object detection architecture. A dataset comprising 978 annotated images, encompassing skull, femur, mandible, and pubis bones, was used to train and validate the model, achieving high detection performance (precision = 0.90, recall = 0.90, mAP@0.5 = 0.984, F1-score = 0.97). The model demonstrated strong generalization across samples from Malaysia and Indonesia. We further developed a Python-based inference script to estimate rodent abundance using skull and paired bone counts. This AI-assisted workflow reduces human error, increases processing throughput, and enables scalable rodent monitoring. By enhancing ecological inference from pellet studies, our approach supports timely biodiversity assessments and pest surveillance strategies across diverse landscapes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.