Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40804118›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Leveraging LSTM, tactile sensors, and haptic feedback to augment prosthetic control via grasp type prediction and grasp type feedback.

Sudhir Solomon Zhuwawu, Haitham El-Hussieny

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sudhir Solomon Zhuwawu *Department of Mechatronics and Robotics Engineering, Egypt-Japan University of Science and Technology (E-JUST), New Burg El-Arab, Alexandria, 21934, Egypt. sudhir.zhuwawu@ejust.edu.eg.
Haitham El-Hussieny *Department of Mechatronics and Robotics Engineering, Egypt-Japan University of Science and Technology (E-JUST), New Burg El-Arab, Alexandria, 21934, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Performing grasping tasks with prosthetic hands is often a slow and clumsy affair, requiring heavy reliance on visual feedback, greatly limiting the use of prosthetic hands in daily life activities. Automating the grasping tasks via machine learning models has emerged as a promising solution. However, these methods diminish user control transforming the prosthetic hand into more of a tool than a natural extension of the body. Alternatively, this work presents a method to predict and provide haptic feedback on the prosthetic hand's current grasp, aiming to aid user decision-making and control without relying on visual cues. Soft tactile sensors and deep learning models recognize the prosthetic hand's grasp type, which is conveyed to the user through a unique haptic stimulation pattern. Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks were employed for the prediction, trained on a diverse dataset of five everyday grasp types. Real-world tests using prosthetic and human hands demonstrate the approach's practicality, with confident predictions made in under one second, achieving average accuracies of 88.68% and 86.44%, respectively. The proposed approach prioritizes user control, providing real-time grasp feedback with the goal of fostering a stronger sense of embodiment despite potentially reduced grasping accuracy compared to previous approaches emphasizing automation.

Indexed as

Artificial LimbsFeedback, SensoryHand StrengthTouchAdultDeep LearningFemaleHandHumansMachine LearningMaleGrasp type feedbackGrasp type predictionLong-short term memory (LSTM)Robotic prosthetic hands

Identifiers

PMID40804118
PMCPMC12350629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.