ArticleScientific reports2025
AGTS: Novel automated generation of smart contract test suites for Hyperledger Fabric.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The robustness and reliability of blockchain applications, critically depend on thorough testing. This study introduces AGTS, an automated framework for generating smart contract test suites on Hyperledger Fabric, significantly reducing manual effort while improving test coverage and security. The framework integrates static and dynamic analysis, leveraging symbolic execution and fuzz testing to detect vulnerabilities. The project is implemented in C#, and uses three test cases: CoCoME, LibraryMS and LoanPS, with their requirements as input, and generates their closely related test cases. We generated 34 test cases for CoCoME, 32 for LibraryMS, and 28 for LoanPS. Combining the test cases, their executable scripts were generated. Finally, we tested all the targeted smart contracts rigorously against the predefined criteria. The generated scripts undergo the quality assurance using ShellCheck, deploying on the continuous integration system, that further enhances the reliability and maintainability of these tests. AGTS automates the entire process of test script creation and verification, drastically reducing the manual effort involved in preparing test cases. It facilitates rapid and thorough testing cycles by generating dedicated scripts that execute specific test scenarios on smart contracts, verifying their behavior and performance. By automating the tedious and error-prone task of writing test cases, AGTS accelerates the development process and fortifies the security framework of blockchain applications. Comprehensive evaluation of AGTS across diverse real world smart contracts demonstrated the effectiveness in defect detection, significantly outperforming existing methods. The contribution of AGTS extends beyond providing a practical testing tool, by offering developers a robust framework for ensuring the reliability and security of their smart contracts. AGTS not only expedites test preparation but also ensures comprehensive test coverage, thus improving the overall quality of blockchain applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.