Observational studyScientific reports2025
The impact of occupational nonhypoxic hypobaria on cerebral function and integrity.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Human limits in next-generation fighter aviation: psychophysiological stressors, readiness, health, performance, and countermeasures.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
- Aerospace stressors and brain health in military aviators: a glymphatic-neurovascular framework.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Repetitive nonhypoxic hypobaria is nearly omnipresent in the aerospace environment and has been shown to be associated with subcortical white matter hyperintensities (WMH) on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This raises the question of whether such exposures may be detrimental to brain structure and function. A single-center observational study was conducted comparing individuals with repetitive nonhypoxic hypobaric exposure, specifically 19 altitude chamber personnel (ACP) from 4 European countries, with 28 healthy controls. MRIs were evaluated for WMH occurrence, volume and distribution, as well as white matter parcellation, cortical volume, and thickness. Additionally, Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) acquisitions were analyzed. Furthermore, neurophysiological (VEP, AEP, OCT) and psychometric tests (Vienna test system, WinSCAT) were performed. Both groups exhibited WMH, although to a lesser extent than reported in the general population. The number and volume of WMH increased with age and were influenced by cumulative chamber exposure time to ACP. Noticeable were circumscribed significant reductions in lateral orbitofrontal cortical volume and thickness as well as decreases in the volume of the pars opercularis of both hemispheres in the study group. Neurophysiological and neuropsychological findings were not different. There are no hints that occupational nonhypoxic hypobaric exposure in ACP, as currently used in the participating NATO Air Forces, can cause brain damage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.