Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40804068›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Mechanodynamic brain on chip for studying human stem cell derived neuronal networks.

Gulden Akcay, Regina Luttge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Novel advanced patient-derivedFrontiers in neurology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gulden AkcayNeuro-Nanoscale Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, 5600 MB, The Netherlands.
Regina LuttgeNeuro-Nanoscale Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, 5600 MB, The Netherlands. r.luttge@tue.nl.

Funding

H2020-FETPROACT-2018-01 824070
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain tissue orchestrates neuronal function through biochemical and mechanical cues. Utilizing in vitro modeling, often the dynamics of mechanical aspects in neuronal cell cultures is neglected. However, the growing recognition of the importance of mechanical cues in neural development and healthy brain function necessitates a shift in how we study cultured neurons. Microfluidic platforms, like a Brain-on-Chip (BoC), can take active mechanical stimuli into account. In our BoC design a set of microchannels manufactured in a glass substrate by FEMTOprint technology is assembled with a spin-coated polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) membrane and a PDMS culture chamber, which was fabricated from a stereolithographically made mold by replication. The membrane can locally deform across the culture chamber by air pressure. This paper describes the design, fabrication and test of such a novel BoC, offering an experimental setting in which we demonstrated mechano-dynamic elevated Calcium signaling in cultured human induced neural stem cell-derived neuronal networks.

Indexed as

BrainLab-On-A-Chip DevicesNerve NetNeural Stem CellsNeuronsCalcium SignalingCell Culture TechniquesCells, CulturedDimethylpolysiloxanesHumansbaysilonDimethylpolysiloxanesBrain-on-Chip (BoC)Calcium live imagingHiPSCs-derived neuronsMechanical stimulationNeuronal activity

Identifiers

PMID40804068
PMCPMC12350671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.