ArticleScientific data2025
An fMRI hyperscanning dataset on cooperation and competition during strategic interactions.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A densely sampled fMRI dataset for investigating food valuation.Scientific data · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hyperscanning has emerged as a prominent technique in social neuroscience, enabling the simultaneous recording of neural activity from multiple individuals engaged in interactive tasks. Despite its potential, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) hyperscanning remains underutilized due to technical and logistical challenges in synchronizing data across scanners. To address these barriers, we developed an internet-based fMRI hyperscanning platform in southern Taiwan, enabling synchronized acquisition between two sites located 305 km apart. The present study involving 33 dyads examined social and economic decision-making tasks under cooperative and competitive conditions, using a Sender-Receiver paradigm where monetary outcomes hinged on the Receiver's choices and their alignment with the Sender's suggestions. This design elucidated neural mechanisms underlying cooperation, competition, deception, and strategic interactions. The resulting dataset enables analyses of neural synchrony, temporal dynamics of functional connectivity, and condition-specific network interactions. By introducing a novel methodological framework, this work provides a valuable dataset to advance research on social decision-making and interactive neural processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.