SynthesisOccupational and environmental medicine2025
Prognostic factors affecting return to work in cancer patients: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Occupational and environmental medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Return to Work and Employment Outcomes in Survivors of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: A Systematic Review.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2026Pooled it
- Return to work among self-employed breast cancer survivors from the CANTO cohort.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- Return to work after upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery: questionnaire-based observational study.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Observational
- Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Return to Work and Multidimensional Health-Related Quality of Life in Adults with Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Trials.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Stakeholder Perspectives on Cancer Survivors' Return to Work and Well-Being: Qualitative Interview Study.JMIR cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Return-to-work rates among working-age cancer survivors present a complex challenge, varying by cancer type and individual characteristics. This study aimed to identify prognostic factors influencing return to work in cancer survivors. A systematic review was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Searches in PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases in December 2024 used keywords based on the Population, Prognostic Factors, Outcomes framework to identify relevant studies. Study quality was evaluated using Joanna Briggs Institute tools and the protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024596102).Twenty studies were selected. Identified factors included sociodemographic: older age, educational level, marital status and sex; clinical: aggressive treatments, comorbidities and physical sequelae; psychological: anxiety, stress, fear of relapse and social support; occupational: flexible work schedules and tasks versus rigid conditions. Multiple factors influence return-to-work outcomes for cancer survivors.Individualised intervention programmes addressing specific patient needs and fostering adapted work environments are essential to promote successful reintegration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.