SynthesisRMD open2025
Assessing the
Synthesis in RMD open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Immunopathogenic Mechanisms in Connective Tissue Disease-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease: Incessant Loop of Immunity to Fibrosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe common gain-of-function variant rs35705950, located in the promoter of
methodsSamples were collected from blood/saliva, followed by DNA extraction and genotyping using SNP arrays. Data for rs35705950 and additional 903 variants within 100 Kb were obtained using genomic imputation. Subsequently, we tested their association in a meta-analysis to increase the consistency of the results, including 10 European ancestry cohorts comprising 2363 patients with SSc-ILD, 3526 SSc patients without ILD and 15 076 controls.
resultsMeta-analysis showed no significant association between rs35705950 and SSc-ILD, either comparing patients with SSc with and without ILD (p value: 0.588, OR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.87 to 1.27) nor patients with SSc-ILD with controls (p value: 0.061, OR: 1.16, 95% CI: 0.99 to 1.36). Moreover, none of the additional 903 variants tested in the genomic region reached statistical significance.
conclusionDespite analysing the largest and most statistically powered SSc-ILD cohort to date, we found no evidence of association between the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.