ReviewJournal of medical genetics2025
New patients with duplication of the pituitary gland-plus syndrome, including a
Review in Journal of medical genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDuplication of the pituitary gland (DPG)-plus syndrome is an extremely rare developmental malformation of unknown aetiology.
methodsTwo unreported patients of DPG-plus syndrome are described. Underlying genetic defects were explored, including chromosomal microarray (CMA), whole exome sequencing (WES) and mRNA analysis. A literature review was presented.
resultsPatient 1 had DPG, palatal cleft, bifid tongue, intraoral teratoma, lingual hamartoma and duplicated basilar artery and odontoid process. Patient 2 had DPG, epignathus teratoma, a nasal mass, choanal atresia, cleft palate, bifid tongue, abnormal basilar artery and fused upper cervical spine. CMA yielded normal results. WES of patient 1 disclosed a novel splice site
conclusionsTwo new cases of DPG-plus syndrome were reported, with rare findings of epignathus and choanal atresia. We propose that DPG-plus syndrome may result from a double hit in one of the genes involved in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.