Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40803737›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Development and pilot testing of a personalised decision aid for decision-making regarding fertility preservation in young female patients with cancer: a study protocol.

Jieun Jang, Eun Mi Lee, Youn Kyung Chung, Dong Ock Lee, Hyeon Jin Park, Ga Won Yim, Keun Seok Lee, June Hyuk Kim, A Ra Ko, Ji Hee Hong and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07038174 (A Study for Development and Testing of Fertility Preservation Decision Aid for Young Cancer Patients), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07038174 nanot yet recruitingnot on this map

A Study for Development and Testing of Fertility Preservation Decision Aid for Young Cancer Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Cancer Center, KoreaRan2025 to 2025Enrolled32ConditionsInfertility, Female, NeoplasmsArmsFertility preservation decision aid intervention group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jieun JangDivision of Clinical Research, Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
Eun Mi LeeDivision of Clinical Research, Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
Youn Kyung ChungCenter for Gynecologic Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
Dong Ock LeeCenter for Gynecologic Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
Hyeon Jin ParkCenter for Pediatric Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
Ga Won YimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
Keun Seok LeeCenter for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
June Hyuk KimDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Rare Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
A Ra KoDepartment of Nursing, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
Ji Hee HongDepartment of Nursing, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
Sokbom KangDivision of Clinical Research, Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea sokbom@ncc.re.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8428-9555

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInfertility resulting from cancer treatment is known to be a major factor that reduces the quality of life of young cancer survivors. However, discussions and decision-making about fertility preservation before cancer treatment have been insufficient owing to barriers in the clinical field. In addition, selecting a fertility preservation option requires a complex decision-making process that considers not only medical information but also the patient's values and preferences. Hence, an environment that more easily supports patient decision-making about fertility preservation needs to be created. Therefore, this protocol will develop and test a web-based decision aid (DA) for fertility preservation among young patients with cancer, considering patient preferences and values, evaluate acceptability and usability of the developed DA and assess its effectiveness. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol outlines the development of a web-based DA for fertility preservation targeting females of reproductive age diagnosed with cancer. It includes alpha testing to evaluate the usability and acceptability of the DA, as well as beta testing to assess its effectiveness outside of clinical settings, both based on an online survey. The web-based DA for fertility preservation consists of three modules: 1) an information collection module, 2) an option suggestion module and 3) a value communication module. The information collection module collects information essential to select appropriate fertility preservation options. The option suggestion module returns all applicable fertility preservation options based on the patient's characteristics, which are essential for determining the appropriate option, such as menarche status and desire for pregnancy. The value communication module provides information on the extent to which each fertility preservation option satisfies the patient's values and preferences. After the development of the DA, a small group of young patients with cancer (n=10) and health providers (n=5) will be asked to use this web-based DA for fertility preservation and assess the acceptability and usability of this DA based on a survey (alpha-testing). By reflecting the feedback of acceptability and usability testing, the DA will be updated for improvement, and clinical field testing (beta-testing pilot trial) will be performed using the updated DA. Beta-testing will be conducted on young patients with cancer (aged 18-40 years) before they receive any curative cancer treatment (n=32). These patients with cancer will be randomly allocated to the DA group (intervention group) or the usual care group (control group). The DA group will use the web-based DA before treatment, and the control group will not have access to the web-based DA and will be asked to decide whether to consult a fertility preservation specialist. The primary outcome of the beta testing will be the level of decisional conflict, and the secondary outcomes will include knowledge, decision self-efficacy, decision readiness, depression severity, quality of life, counselling on fertility preservation and decision-making about fertility preservation. Outcomes, including decisional conflict, knowledge, decision self-efficacy, quality of life and depression severity, will be measured before the intervention (T0), 1 week after the intervention (T1) and 1 month after the intervention (T2). The readiness for decision-making will be assessed at T1 for the intervention group only. Counselling on fertility preservation and decision-making about fertility preservation will be assessed once after testing (T2) for both the intervention and control groups. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study will be conducted in accordance with ethical standards and was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the National Cancer Centre, Korea (IRB No. NCC2024-0050). All study participants will provide written informed consent before participation. The results generated from this study will be presented at conferences or scientific meetings and disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

trial registrationNCT07038174 (beta-testing phase).

Indexed as

Decision MakingDecision Support TechniquesFertility PreservationNeoplasmsAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansInternetPatient PreferencePilot ProjectsQuality of LifeYoung AdultDecision AidDecision MakingFertility PreservationNeoplasmsShared

Identifiers

PMID40803737
PMCPMC12352208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.