ArticleBMJ open2025
Applications of implementation science (IS) in learning health systems (LHS): a scoping review protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionDespite advancements in biomedical and healthcare research, the translation of evidence into routine practice within healthcare systems often lags, perpetuating inefficiencies and disparities in care delivery. Learning health systems (LHS), which integrate internal data and external evidence for continuous improvement, hold promise for addressing these gaps. Implementation science (IS), focused on promoting the systematic uptake of evidence-based practices, offers a robust framework to drive sustainable improvements within LHS. However, the practical application of IS principles in LHS remains underexplored. This scoping review aims to systematically map the literature on the application of IS in LHS, highlighting themes, gaps and opportunities for advancing future practices. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews, supported by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. The review employs a population-concept-context framework, focusing on studies engaged in LHS activities and the application of IS principles in various healthcare settings. Relevant literature will be searched across multiple databases, including OVID/Medline, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection and Health Policy Reference Center. Eligible studies will be screened, and data will be extracted and synthesised using both quantitative and qualitative methods. Key outcomes include characterising IS applications in LHS, evaluating barriers and facilitators, exploring equity integration, and identifying knowledge gaps. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As this study does not involve primary data collection, ethical approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations to inform future research and practice. REGISTRATION: This protocol has been registered on the Open Science Framework (DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/BMQ6J).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.