ArticleExperimental eye research2025
Investigation of two pore types in Schlemm's canal inner wall endothelium in flow-type areas using serial block-face scanning electron microscopy.
Article in Experimental eye research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Segmental flow responses in glaucomatous trabecular meshwork cells.Biomaterials advances · 2026Article
- Expression changes of human Schlemm's canal endothelial cells in response to cyclic mechanical stretch.Experimental eye research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the introduction of automated serial block-face imaging, we can now more accurately investigate the characteristics of pores in the inner wall endothelium of Schlemm's canal (SC). Previous studies analyzing pores using two-dimensional (2D) scanning or transmission electron microscopy were limited to either en face or random cross-sectional imaging and may have overlooked some of the pores. Additionally, the pores' morphological characteristics in different segmental flow areas (i.e. high-, low-, and non-flow) have not been fully explored. This study aimed to further characterize the two types of pores in different flow areas of human eyes using serial block-face scanning electron microscopy (SBF-SEM). Two normal human eyes were perfused at 15 mmHg with fluorescent tracers to label high-, low-, and non-flow outflow areas before being dissected, sectioned serially (thickness = 0.13 μm), and imaged. A total of 10,832 serial images were examined to identify all intracellular pores (I-pores) and intercellular or border pores (B-pores). Pore densities per unit inner wall area and per inner wall cell nucleus were measured, and pore sizes were determined. The locations of I-pores on giant vacuoles (GVs), whether on the top or sides of GVs, were classified. Pores that would be potentially missed using 2D scanning electron microscopy and I-pores on the edges of inner wall cells that could be mistaken for B-pores were identified. We observed 729 pores, of which 656 (90.0 %) were GV-associated I-pores, 25 (3.4 %) were non-GV-associated I-pores, and 48 (6.6 %) were B-pores. Overall, there were significantly more I-pores (93.4 %) than B-pores (6.6 %). Of all I-pores, the majority (96.3 %) were associated with GVs. A significantly greater number of GV-associated I-pores were located on the side of GVs (413/656, 63.0 %), compared to the top of GVs (243/656, 37.0 %; P ≤ 0.01), which was observed similarly in all flow-type areas. I-pore density was higher in high-flow areas compared to low- or non-flow areas in both eyes, whereas B-pore densities did not appear to differ between flow-type areas. From an en face view via traditional SEM, 6.6 % of I-pores were on the sides of GVs and/or near the edge of cells and could have been mistaken as B-pores. Additionally, 32.0 % of all pores could have been missed by 2D-SEM due to obstruction by neighboring cells/GVs (31.4 % of I-pores and 39.6 % of B-pores). Median major and minor axes of I-pores were significantly smaller in high-flow areas, compared to non-flow areas (P = 0.024 and P = 0.048, respectively). B-pores were not significantly different in size among flow-type areas. SBF-SEM and three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction provided an improved method to identify the pores of SC inner wall, as the cells could be rotated freely to any viewpoint. This study applied a novel method to investigate the morphological characteristics of pores and found that pores in high-flow areas were more numerous and smaller than in non-flow areas, suggesting that pore morphology and density may play a role in the regulation of segmental aqueous humor outflow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.