Observational studyAmerican journal of ophthalmology2025
Peripheral Macular Endothelial Dystrophy: Clinical, Histopathologic, Genetic and Functional Characterization.
Observational study in American journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo report a CHST6-associated corneal endothelial dystrophy.
designProspective observational case series.
participantsThirty-five individuals from seven families, including 13 affected individuals exhibiting corneal epithelial and stromal edema, peripheral posterior corneal macular opacities, and endothelial guttae, as well as 22 unaffected family members.
methodsWhole-exome sequencing was performed in 3 families and Sanger sequencing of CHST6 was performed in all individuals. Histological examination of Descemet membrane (DM) excised at the time of endothelial keratoplasty was performed for three probands. Serum keratan sulfate (KS) levels were measured in members of six families. Functional analysis of identified mutations was performed using CHST6 promoter containing CHST6 expression vector in human keratocytes (HK) and corneal endothelial cells (HCEnC).
main outcome measuresClinical phenotype; genetic analysis; functional analysis of identified CHST6 mutations; serum KS levels; histologic examinations of DM.
resultsAll affected individuals demonstrated peripheral macular opacities at the level of DM. Visually significant corneal edema in affected individuals was successfully managed by endothelial keratoplasty. Genetic analysis demonstrated a rare CHST6 promoter mutation (c.-690G>C) in the homozygous state in affected individuals from three families and in the compound heterozygous state with a CHST6 coding mutation (p.R211Q, p.Y268C or p.P280L) in affected individuals from the other four families. In silico analysis predicted c.-690G>C to be a regulatory variant, located at the RNA polymerase II binding site. Functional analysis in vitro demonstrated that c.-690G>C leads to increased KS sulfation in the corneal endothelium and DM, with no change of KS sulfation in keratocytes. Histologic examination of DM from affected individuals revealed elevated levels of sulfated and non-sulfated KS in DM and endothelium, consistent with the functional analysis. Minimum changes in serum sulfated KS levels were observed in affected individuals.
conclusionsWe suggest the name Peripheral macular endothelial dystrophy (PMED) to describe this dystrophy that is characterized by peripheral posterior corneal macular opacities and endothelial dysfunction without stromal haze or opacities. Given that both PMED and macular corneal dystrophy are associated with promoter and coding region mutations in CHST6, we propose that they be categorized as CHST6-associated corneal dystrophies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.