ArticleOphthalmology. Retina2026
Long-Term Metformin Use and Reduced Risk of Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Large Database Study.
Article in Ophthalmology. Retina, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Regenerative Therapies for Cosmetic Dermatology for Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: Skin Aging, Aesthetic Concerns, and Evidence-Based Best Practices.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- From Diabetes to Degenerative Diseases: The Multifaceted Action of Metformin.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the association between metformin use and the risk of developing age-related macular degeneration (AMD) among patients with diabetes, with a focus on exposure duration and AMD subtypes.
designRetrospective cohort study.
participantsPatients were identified from the TriNetX network using International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, and Current Procedural Terminology codes for diabetes and ophthalmic care. Patients aged ≥60 years with diabetes and no documentation of AMD were included in the cohort.
methodsPatients were required to have no AMD diagnoses at 2 eye care visits ≥1 year apart, with the second visit serving as the index event for analysis. The main exposure was yearly metformin use for ≥5 years, with subanalysis up to 10 years. The outcome was incident AMD. Propensity score matching controlled for potential confounders, including demographics, comorbidities, medications, laboratory values, and health care utilization. The association between metformin and AMD was assessed using survival analysis. Results were reported as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was a new diagnosis of AMD. Secondary outcomes included a new diagnosis of dry AMD and wet AMD.
resultsAfter propensity score matching, the main cohort analysis included 7496 patients, of whom 3748 had ≥5 consecutive years of metformin use. Incident AMD was documented in 122 (3.3%) patients who had been exposed to metformin and 184 (4.9%) who had not (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.54-0.85). The metformin group had lower rates of both dry AMD (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.53-0.90) and wet AMD (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.50-1.39), although the association with wet AMD was not statistically significant. The metformin use for ≥6 consecutive years showed consistent protective effects; 1 to 4 years showed weaker associations.
conclusionsProlonged metformin use in patients with diabetes was associated with a reduction in AMD risk in this claims database. These findings suggest a potential protective role for metformin, warranting further exploration of its long-term effects on AMD prevention. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.