Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40803152›Full record

SynthesisBreast (Edinburgh, Scotland)2025

Clinical and economic research of bone modifiers as adjuvant therapy for early breast cancer: A systematic literature review.

Wenhua Wu, Yixiao Zhu, Huiting Lin, Jia Liu, Suyan Liu, Lirong Zhang, Jiaqin Cai, Hong Sun, Xiaoxia Wei

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Wenhua WuDepartment of Pharmacy, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou University Affiliated Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou 350001, PR China; School of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350001, PR China.
Yixiao ZhuSchool of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350001, PR China.
Huiting LinDepartment of Pharmacy, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou University Affiliated Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou 350001, PR China; School of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350001, PR China.
Jia LiuDepartment of Pharmacy, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou University Affiliated Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou 350001, PR China; School of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350001, PR China.
Suyan LiuDepartment of Pharmacy, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou University Affiliated Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou 350001, PR China; School of Pharmacy, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, Fujian 350001, PR China.
Lirong ZhangDepartment of Pharmacy, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou University Affiliated Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou 350001, PR China; School of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350001, PR China.
Jiaqin CaiDepartment of Pharmacy, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou University Affiliated Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou 350001, PR China; School of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350001, PR China.
Hong SunDepartment of Pharmacy, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou University Affiliated Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou 350001, PR China; School of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350001, PR China.
Xiaoxia WeiDepartment of Pharmacy, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou University Affiliated Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou 350001, PR China; School of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350001, PR China. Electronic address: xxwei0321@outlook.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdjuvant bisphosphonate therapy is recommended by some guidelines for postmenopausal breast cancer, but its application is not ideal due to inconsistent study results and economic burden considerations. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of bone modifiers in breast cancer adjuvant treatment to inform clinical practice and health policy.

methodsPubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched using terms related to bone modifiers and breast cancer. The included studies comprised clinical trials evaluating adjuvant bone modifiers in early breast cancer (EBC) that reported recurrence, metastasis, or survival outcomes, as well as economic studies that reported costs and effects. Quality was assessed using Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and Quality of Health Economic Studies scale. We also summarized current international guideline recommendations regarding adjuvant bone modifiers in EBC.

resultsOf the 31 eligible articles, findings showed that zoledronic acid and clodronate demonstrated reduced recurrence and improved survival in low-estrogen EBC patients, whereas ibandronate showed no significant benefit. Other bisphosphonates and denosumab require further investigation. Bone modifiers were generally well-tolerated, with mild adverse events. Serious events like nephrotoxicity, osteonecrosis of the jaw, and atypical femoral fractures were rare but necessitate monitoring and prevention. Economic studies suggest that adjuvant zoledronic acid may be cost-effective for postmenopausal EBC patients.

conclusionMany unresolved issues remain regarding bone modifiers in EBC adjuvant therapy. Insufficient clinical and economic evidence precludes drawing comprehensive conclusions at present. Future studies need to provide higher-quality evidence to deepen our understanding of adjuvant therapy with bone modifiers.

Indexed as

Bone Density Conservation AgentsBreast NeoplasmsDiphosphonatesChemotherapy, AdjuvantClodronic AcidCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalZoledronic AcidBone Density Conservation AgentsClodronic AcidDiphosphonatesZoledronic AcidAdjuvant therapyBisphosphonatesBone modifiersBreast cancerDenosumab

Identifiers

PMID40803152
PMCPMC12359659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.