ArticleClinical imaging2025
A multimodal automated deep learning-based model for predicting biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer following prostatectomy from baseline MRI, Presurgical clinical covariates.
Article in Clinical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Artificial Intelligence in Predicting Prostate Cancer Biochemical Recurrence: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Development and Validation of a Multimodal AI-Based Model for Predicting Post-Prostatectomy Treatment Outcomes from Baseline Biparametric Prostate MRI.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- The potential of artificial intelligence in clinical trials.European journal of clinical investigation · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo develop a multimodal deep learning-based AI algorithm and investigate its ability to predict BCR of PCa after radical prostatectomy (RP) using MRI and clinical data.
methodsPCa patients (n = 311) underwent prostate MRI prior to RP between January 2008 and December 2018. For each patient, CAPRA-S was calculated. Quantitative imaging features were extracted using methods developed in a previous study. Test set results were assessed independently for each model in the study, using cross-validation of the training set to tune hyperparameters and select features. DeLong's test compared AUROC curve values, and log-rank tests compared BCR-free survival curves.
resultsAcross all patients, the AUROC of the automated multimodal model was 0.74, compared to 0.66 for CAPRA-S. This model had the highest sensitivity at 75 %, with CAPRA-S at 37 %. BCR-free survival curves for the test set were generated for each model. Log-rank tests indicated each model differentiated between patient outcomes (p < 0.05). The automated multimodal model was the only model with p < 0.01. Focusing on intermediate risk patients (CAPRA-S scores 3-5), this automated model was the only model which maintained the ability to differentiate between outcomes (p < 0.01), while all other models and CAPRA-S failed to differentiate intermediate risk BCR outcomes (p > 0.05).
conclusionDevelopment of a multimodal model using quantitative imaging features and clinical covariates revealed that an automated multimodal AI approach most effectively predicts BCR in PCa patients. Based on AUROC and the ability to differentiate between BCR-free survival outcomes with statistical significance in intermediate risk patients, this model outperforms the gold standard postsurgical CAPRA-S risk scores.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.