Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40802912›Full record

ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2025

Meaning for reading: the neurocognitive basis of semantic reading impairment after stroke.

Ryan Staples, J Vivian Dickens, Sara M Dyslin, Andrew T DeMarco, Sarah F Snider, Rhonda B Friedman, Peter E Turkeltaub

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ryan StaplesCenter for Brain Plasticity and Recovery, Departments of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20057, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9440-4767
J Vivian DickensDepartment of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8874-5442
Sara M DyslinCenter for Brain Plasticity and Recovery, Departments of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20057, USA.
Andrew T DeMarcoCenter for Brain Plasticity and Recovery, Departments of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20057, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1987-2012
Sarah F SniderCenter for Aphasia Research and Rehabilitation, Department of Neurology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20057, USA.
Rhonda B FriedmanCenter for Aphasia Research and Rehabilitation, Department of Neurology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20057, USA.
Peter E TurkeltaubCenter for Brain Plasticity and Recovery, Departments of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20057, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2080-6055

Funding

Translational Biomedical Science Training GrantTL1TR001431 · NCATS · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI LEE, DEXTER L, SANDBERG, KATHRYN L · 2015 to 2024
$4.8M
Contributions of spared brain structures and connections to aphasia recoveryR01DC014960 · NIDCD · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI TURKELTAUB, PETER ETHAN · 2017 to 2021
$4.0M
Brain networks for reading in stroke alexia and typical agingR01DC020446 · NIDCD · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI RHONDA B FRIEDMAN, Peter Ethan Turkeltaub · 2022 to 2026
$3.2M
Georgetown University Brain and Language Training ProgramT32DC019481 · NIDCD · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI Peter Ethan Turkeltaub · 2022 to 2026
$2.1M
Functional anomaly mapping of aphasia recoveryR00DC018828 · NIDCD · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI DEMARCO, ANDREW T · 2023 to 2025
$747k
Mapping the Neurocognitive Architecture of ReadingF30DC018215 · NIDCD · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI DICKENS, JONATHAN VIVIAN · 2019 to 2023
$193k
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR001431NIDCD NIH HHS F30 DC018215NIDCD NIH HHS R00 DC018828NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014960NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC020446NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC019481NIH NCATS TL1TR001431NIH NICDC F30DC018215NIH NIDCD R00DC018828NIH NIDCD R01DC014960NIH NIDCD R01DC020446
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diagnosis of alexia has historically focused on syndromes such as surface alexia, which capture discrete patterns of reading deficits observed in some patients but do not describe the breadth of reading deficits observed in practice. Aphasia research has recently shifted focus to language process impairments rather than syndromic classifications. A similar shift in focus to reading process impairments might improve our diagnostic approach to alexia. Behavioural evidence suggests that semantic processing influences reading aloud and that semantic deficits in the context of semantic dementia underlie surface alexia. Because stroke rarely causes loss of semantic knowledge and surface alexia as a syndromic diagnosis is unusual after stroke, semantic reading deficits in stroke alexia have not previously been examined systematically. Semantic reading deficits in stroke may not relate to semantic deficits per se, but rather an inability to use semantics to support reading. Imageability, the degree to which a word brings to mind an image, is one index of semantic influences on reading. High-imageability words are read more quickly by healthy persons and more accurately following brain damage. Here, we test whether deficits of semantic reading after stroke, as indexed by reduced imageability effects, result from semantic or post-semantic processes. Examining non-verbal semantic processing, semantics-phonology mapping and semantic control in 56 left-hemisphere stroke survivors, only better semantics-phonology mapping ability predicted better accuracy on high-imageability words. Neither semantic nor post-semantic scores related to low-imageability word accuracy. Support vector regression voxel-based lesion symptom mapping revealed that damage along the superior temporal sulcus and underlying white matter, extending into the middle and superior temporal gyri, reduced the advantage of high-imageability over low-imageability words during reading, reflecting an inability to use semantics to support reading. A similar cluster related to impairments in semantics-phonology mapping. The imageability and semantics-phonology mapping results overlapped in the left posterior superior temporal sulcus. Support vector regression connectome lesion symptom mapping revealed that white matter disconnections within a broad temporoparietal network important for phonological and semantic processing were associated with a reduction of the imageability advantage during reading. These results demonstrate that, irrespective of syndromic classification, semantic reading deficits occur in left-hemisphere stroke survivors owing to impaired integration of semantic and phonological representations and that the left posterior superior temporal sulcus underlies this process. Our results clarify the neurobiology of reading aloud and support the existence of a post-semantic impairment of semantic reading in left-hemisphere stroke survivors.

Indexed as

DyslexiaDyslexia, AcquiredReadingSemanticsStrokeAdultAgedFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle Agedalexialanguagelesion–symptom mappingreadingsemanticsstroke

Identifiers

PMID40802912
PMCPMC12404773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.