Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40802908›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2025

Benefit of Chemoradiotherapy Versus Chemotherapy After Induction Therapy for Conversion of Unresectable Into Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: The Randomized CONKO-007 Trial.

Rainer Fietkau, Michael Ghadimi, Robert Grützmann, Uwe A Wittel, Lutz Jacobasch, Waldemar Uhl, Roland S Croner, Wolf Otto Bechstein, Ulf Peter Neumann, Dirk Waldschmidt and 14 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Pancreatic cancer.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Rainer FietkauDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8295-7145
Michael GhadimiDepartment of General, Visceral and Pediatric Surgery, Medical Center, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8208-1526
Robert GrützmannComprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany.
Uwe A WittelDepartment for General- and Visceral Surgery, Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Lutz JacobaschPrivate Practice of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Dresden, Germany.
Waldemar UhlDepartment of Surgery, St Josef Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Roland S CronerDepartment of General-, Vascular-, Visceral- and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Wolf Otto BechsteinDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Frankfurt University Hospital and Clinics, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3267-8145
Ulf Peter NeumannDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3831-8917
Dirk WaldschmidtDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Stefan BoeckDepartment of Medical Oncology and Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Klinikum Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1922-2127
Nicolas MoosmannNational Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), NCT WERA, a partnership between DKFZ, and the universities and university hospitals in Würzburg, Erlangen, Regensburg and Augsburg, Germany.
Anke C Reinacher-SchickDepartment for Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, St Josef-Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7838-6877
Henriette GolcherComprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3362-7857
Werner AdlerDepartment of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Sabine SemrauDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
Dorota LubganDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2569-3814
Annett KalliesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0009-0008-3508-2575
Markus HechtDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2082-216X
Iris TischoffDepartment of Pathology, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Andrea TannapfelDepartment of Pathology, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Benjamin FreyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
Helmut OettleOutpatient Department Hematology/Oncology, Friedrichshafen, Germany.
CONKO Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the benefit, measured as complete removal of a tumor so that no tumor cells are detectable during histopathologic examination of the resection margin (R0 resection rate), of induction chemotherapy plus chemoradiotherapy (CRT) compared with chemotherapy alone for unresectable pancreatic tumors. PATIENTS AND

methodsCONKO-007, an investigator-initiated open-label, multicentric, phase III randomized clinical trial, enrolled 525 patients with unresectable tumors, and 495 patients received induction chemotherapy (402 with fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin [FOLFIRINOX] and 93 with gemcitabine). Patients without progression after 3 months of induction chemotherapy (n = 336) were randomly assigned for continuation of the same chemotherapy (n = 167) or CRT (n = 169; 50.4Gy concurrently with gemcitabine). Resectability was centrally reassessed by a panel of surgeons. Surgery was recommended if possible. After an interim analysis, the primary end point was changed from overall survival (OS) to overall R0 resection rate because of slow recruitment. The median follow-up was 76 months. Important planned secondary end points were R0 resection rate in the surgically treated population and OS.

resultsThe primary end point (overall R0 resection rate) was not significantly different between treatment arms with 25% (43 of 169) in the CRT arm versus 18% in the chemotherapy arm (30 of 167;

conclusionAlthough not improving overall R0 resection rate or survival, CRT enables a R0 resection in surgically treated patients more often than chemotherapy alone.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemoradiotherapyInduction ChemotherapyPancreatic NeoplasmsAdultAgedDeoxycytidineFemaleFluorouracilGemcitabineHumansIrinotecanLeucovorinMaleMiddle AgedOxaliplatinDeoxycytidineFluorouracilfolfirinoxGemcitabineIrinotecanLeucovorinOxaliplatin

Identifiers

PMID40802908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.