Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40802824›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2025

Image Imputation with conditional generative adversarial networks captures clinically relevant imaging features on computed tomography.

Joseph Rich, Jonathan Le, Ragheb Raad, Tapas Tejura, Ali Rastegarpour, Inderbir Gill, Vinay Duddalwar, Assad Oberai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Joseph RichDepartment of Radiology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1400-8479
Jonathan LeDepartment of Radiology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Ragheb RaadDepartment of Aerospace & Mechanical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Tapas TejuraDepartment of Radiology, Los Angeles General Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Ali RastegarpourDepartment of Radiology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7338-6739
Inderbir GillInstitute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Vinay DuddalwarDepartment of Radiology, Los Angeles General Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Assad OberaiDepartment of Aerospace & Mechanical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Kidney cancer is among the top 10 most common malignancies in adults, and is commonly evaluated with four-phase computed tomography (CT) imaging. However, the presence of missing or corrupted images remains a significant problem in medical imaging that impairs the detection, diagnosis, and treatment planning of kidney cancer. Deep learning approaches through conditional generative adversarial networks (cGANs) have recently shown technical promise in the task of imputing missing imaging data from these four-phase studies. In this study, we explored the clinical utility of these imputed images. We utilized a cGAN trained on 333 patients, with the task of the cGAN being to impute the image of any phase given the other three phases. We tested the clinical utility on the imputed images of the 37 patients in the test set by manually extracting 21 clinically relevant imaging features and comparing them to their ground truth counterpart. All 13 categorical clinical features had greater than 85% agreement rate between true images and their imputed counterparts. This high accuracy is maintained when stratifying across imaging phases. Imputed images also show good agreement with true images in select radiomic features including mean intensity and enhancement. Imputed images possess the features characteristic of benign or malignant diagnosis at an equivalent rate to true images. In conclusion, imputed images from cGANs have large potential for clinical use due to their ability to retain clinically relevant qualitative and quantitative features.

Identifiers

PMID40802824
PMCPMC12349720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.