Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40802667›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2025

Effectiveness of cold-water immersion vs. massage in reducing delayed-onset muscle soreness and enhancing recovery following CrossFit® Murph Workout: Randomized rial.

Gabrielly Santos Pereira, Giovana Eduarda Paulino, Thais Helena Martins Faria de Almeida, Cissa Maria Ribeiro Siqueira, Josie Resende Torres da Silva, Marcelo Lourenço da Silva, Luciano Maia Alves Ferrera

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gabrielly Santos PereiraLaboratory of Neuroscience, Neuromodulation and Study of Pain (LANNED), UNIFAL-MG, Alfenas, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Giovana Eduarda PaulinoLaboratory of Neuroscience, Neuromodulation and Study of Pain (LANNED), UNIFAL-MG, Alfenas, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Thais Helena Martins Faria de AlmeidaLaboratory of Neuroscience, Neuromodulation and Study of Pain (LANNED), UNIFAL-MG, Alfenas, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Cissa Maria Ribeiro SiqueiraLaboratory of Neuroscience, Neuromodulation and Study of Pain (LANNED), UNIFAL-MG, Alfenas, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6546-9090
Josie Resende Torres da SilvaLaboratory of Neuroscience, Neuromodulation and Study of Pain (LANNED), UNIFAL-MG, Alfenas, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Marcelo Lourenço da SilvaLaboratory of Neuroscience, Neuromodulation and Study of Pain (LANNED), UNIFAL-MG, Alfenas, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5523-5910
Luciano Maia Alves FerreraNeuromodulation and Pain Lab (NeuroPain), Egas Moniz Interdisciplinary Research Center (CiiEM), Almada, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Murph workout, one of the most challenging CrossFit® workouts, demands endurance and high intensity. This WOD (Workout of the Day) includes a 1-mile run, 100 pull-ups, 200 push-ups, 300 air squats, and another 1-mile run, typically performed while wearing a weighted vest. Due to its high physical demands, athletes commonly experience Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness (DOMS), characterized by increased sensitivity, fatigue, and reduced muscle function. To minimize these effects and ensure proper recovery, it is essential to adopt strategies that restore muscle function, reduce pain, and allow athletes to return to training without an elevated risk of injury. Thus, the objective of this study was to investigate the effects of massage therapy (MAS) or cold-water immersion (CWI) as a recovery intervention for DOMS in athletes following high-intensity physical activity during the CrossFit® Murph workout. For this purpose, thirty individuals with a minimum of six months of CrossFit® experience and familiarity with all exercises used in the study were recruited. Pain assessment questionnaires, including the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and the A-DOM questionnaire, along with a socioeconomic questionnaire, were administered before and after WOD. Additionally, pain assessments were conducted using algometry and thermographic imaging. After completing the WOD, participants were randomly assigned to one of two recovery interventions: MAS or CWI. The study results highlight the differential impacts of CWI and MAS on pain management and recovery dynamics following structured exercise. Our findings clearly demonstrate that CWI significantly reduces pain prevalence, both at rest and during exercise, as evidenced by the absence of pain reports from participants 48 hours after the intervention. While our study provides valuable insights into the effectiveness of CWI and MAS for post-exercise recovery, limitations such as the non-blinded study design and small sample size may influence the generalizability of the findings.

Indexed as

CryotherapyImmersionMassageMyalgiaAdultAthletesCold TemperatureFemaleHumansMaleWaterYoung AdultWater

Identifiers

PMID40802667
PMCPMC12349088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.