ArticlePloS one2025
Clade-specific elemental signatures across an Early Triassic marine fauna pave the way for deciphering the affinities of unidentifiable fossils.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In palaeontology, the observation of morphological characters is at the heart of species determination. Nonetheless, since most fossils have undergone considerable morphological loss, distortion, and/or flattening throughout their taphonomic history, the use of visual techniques often remains limited. Complementary approaches such as geochemical analyses or molecular palaeontology are increasingly developed. However, them as well remain limited by the preservation state and diagenetic overprinting of the vast majority of fossils. Based on data obtained by state-of-the-art non-destructive synchrotron micro-X-ray fluorescence (µXRF) major-to-trace elemental mapping of Early Triassic Paris Biota fossils, we show here, at least within a single fossil fauna, the existence of a clade-specific elemental signature. Using complete multi-elemental µXRF spectra instead of elemental quantifications/concentrations, we set a data-formatting protocol that allows us to compare the morphology of the spectra. We then statistically demonstrate the existence of a geochemical discrimination between specimens of different clade despite intra-clade mineralogical variability, and build a "elemental-comparative taxonomic identification" model accordingly. The latter, that goes beyond the simple distinction of tissue nature or type of preservation, is all the more important as it appears to hold the potential to identify some hitherto unrecognizable specimens of the fossil record.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.