ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2025
Experiences and Perceptions About Death Reporting and Notification Among Rural Communities on the Islands of Lake Victoria, Uganda: Qualitative Study.
Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mortality data are critical for planning and prioritization of public health interventions and are generated through civil registration and vital statistics systems like mortality surveillance systems. However, frameworks for strengthening mortality surveillance systems do not acknowledge the cultural relativism surrounding death and how it influences strategies to improve mortality surveillance systems. Objective: This paper aims to describe the experiences and perceptions about death reporting and notification among rural dwellers on the islands of Lake Victoria in Central Uganda. Methods: The study was conducted in Buvuma and Kalangala Districts on Lake Victoria using a phenomenological qualitative research design. We conducted 12 in-depth interviews with community members who were purposively identified by village leaders and had experienced the death of a next of kin and reported and notified, and 8 in-depth interviews with those who had experienced the loss of a next of kin but did not notify and report the death. Key informant interviews were also conducted with 2 police officers and 2 cultural leaders. A total of 4 focus group discussions were conducted among village leaders. Interviews were abductively analyzed to generate grand narratives. Results: The findings revealed 6 grand narratives of the perceptions and experiences of the process of death reporting and notification among the rural dwellers. These include (1) death reporting and notification are preceded by a tragic event that affects how, when, and if it is conducted; (2) a long and cumbersome process; (3) a process that involves multiple stakeholders with official and unofficial roles and responsibilities; (4) a process with little perceived individual or societal value; (5) a process with several mandatory but unofficial costs; and (6) a process preceded by events with deep cultural undertones. Conclusions: Death reporting and notification are perceived to be tedious and cumbersome, which discourages community members from conducting them. There is a need to evaluate the process to remove any perceived or actual barriers through strategies such as decentralization of the process to lower levels of political administration. Death reporting and notification are also part of a broader social context that includes cultural beliefs, norms, and traditions. Efforts to strengthen mortality surveillance systems would profit from acknowledging the broader sociocultural issues around death and grieving and the role that cultural and religious institutions can contribute to addressing misconceptions and articulating the benefit of the process to society.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.