ArticleCancer2025
Mutational analysis of primary and advanced chordoma tissue using next-generation sequencing.
Article in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- From Histology to Multi-Omics: Review of Chordoma Classification and Its Clinical Implications.Cells · 2026Review
- Progression-free survival 3 of 22 months achieved through third-line therapy with adebrelimab in patient with recurrent chordoma: a case report.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Mutational analysis of primary and advanced chordoma tissue using next-generation sequencing.Cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChordomas are rare ectodermal bone malignancies derived from transformed notochordal remnants. Histologic variants include conventional (80%-90%), chondroid (5%-15%), and dedifferentiated (2%-8%). Because chordomas are relatively resistant to chemotherapy and radiotherapy, novel targeted agents are needed to expand treatment approaches and improve outcomes. This study analyzes the genomic landscape of chordoma and identifies potential pathogenic and druggable targets.
methodsEighty-six tumor samples derived from chordoma patients treated at Massachusetts General Hospital, University of California, Los Angeles, and the University of Miami were included. Tumor specimens were sent for comprehensive molecular profiling using next-generation sequencing. The most frequently mutated genes were identified and categorized by subtype, and microsatellite instability and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) staining were assessed.
resultsHistologic subtypes included 70 conventional (81.4%), nine chondroid (10.5%), and seven dedifferentiated chordomas (8.1%). The most common mutations were cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A/B (CDKN2A/B) (28 of 86, 33%), low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1B (10 of 86, 12%), polybromo-1 (9 of 86, 11%), and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) (8 of 86, 9%). By subtype, CDKN2A/B mutation was most common in conventional chordoma (24 of 70, 34%), and chondroid chordoma (3 of 9, 33%). CDKN2A/B and EGFR mutations were most common in dedifferentiated chordoma (2/7, 29%). Microsatellite instability was not detected in seven of 69 (10.1%) samples. PD-L1 staining of tumor and immune cells was scarce, with scores <1 in 38 of 41 (92.7%) and 22 of 25 (88%) patients, respectively.
conclusionsThis study provides a robust, high-dimensional sequencing assessment from 86 chordoma tissue samples and a descriptive overview of the genomic landscape of this rare, difficult to treat malignancy. Future studies should include in vitro assessment of gain and loss of function of frequently altered pathways to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.