Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40802459›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)2026

We are what we eat: Cross-cultural self-prioritization effects for food stimuli.

Mario Dalmaso, Michele Vicovaro, Toshiki Saito, Katsumi Watanabe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. We are what we eat: Cross-cultural self-prioritization effects for food stimuli.British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953) · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mario DalmasoDepartment of Developmental and Social Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0199-7861
Michele VicovaroDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Toshiki SaitoFaculty of Science and Engineering, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan.
Katsumi WatanabeFaculty of Science and Engineering, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of ScienceMinistero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous research has shown that the concept of self is malleable and can be associated with various arbitrary stimuli. This study explored whether the self could be linked to images of food representative of one's own or a different culture. We compared two groups, Italian and Japanese individuals, whose cultures are both characterized by rich and distinctive food traditions. Participants performed a perceptual matching task, associating themselves with either Italian or Japanese food, depending on the block. They also reported their food habits and preferences. The findings revealed that, in both groups, the self could extend to include food stimuli from both cultural categories. However, the self was more strongly associated with food typical of the participant's own culture. Additionally, this association was unrelated to reluctance to try unfamiliar foods, as measured by the Food Neophobia Scale. These results underscore the central role of food in shaping personal identity, supporting the hypothesis of a modulatory effect of valence on the strength of self-association with arbitrary items and suggesting that self-related food associations may influence food preferences.

Indexed as

Cross-Cultural ComparisonFeeding BehaviorFoodFood PreferencesSelf ConceptAdultFemaleHumansItalyJapanMaleYoung Adultcross‐cultural comparisonfood perceptionperceptual matching taskself‐prioritization effect

Identifiers

PMID40802459
PMCPMC12783875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.