ArticleBrazilian dental journal2025
Exploring how surface treatments affect the bond stability of lithium disilicate ceramic to resin cement during try-in.
Article in Brazilian dental journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated how different surface treatments affect the bond strength of resin cement to lithium disilicate ceramic subjected to try-in. Lithium disilicate (IPS e.max CAD) slices were randomly assigned to 5 experimental groups based on surface treatment protocols with 5% hydrofluoric acid (HF) and silane (SIL) application timing: HF PRE + SIL POST (HF before and SIL after), HF SIL PRE (both HF and SIL before), HF SIL POST (both HF and SIL after), HF SIL PRE + SIL POST (SIL reapplied after), and HF SIL PRE + HF SIL POST (re-treated). Two control groups were included: CTRL+ (no try-in) and CTRL- (no cleaning step after try-in). Resin cement cylinders (n= 56) were bonded and tested for microshear bond strength after 24 hours (baseline) or after 210 days + 25,000 thermal cycles. At baseline, no significant differences were found. After aging, the re-treated groups had the highest bond strength, while the control groups had the lowest. Intermediate results were observed in HF SIL PRE, HF SIL POST, and HF PRE + SIL POST. Try-in remnants were found on HF SIL PRE, and re-etching led to significant matrix dissolution. Post-try-in silane application created a surface layer on the etched ceramic. Cleaning after try-in is crucial for long-term adhesive behavior, regardless of the surface treatment protocol. Applying silane before try-in acts as a protective layer while reapplying silane after try-in further enhances adhesive stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.