Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40802448›Full record

ArticleBrazilian dental journal2025

Exploring how surface treatments affect the bond stability of lithium disilicate ceramic to resin cement during try-in.

Rafaela Oliveira Pilecco, Renan Vaz Machry, Amanda Maria de Oliveira Dal Piva, João Paulo Mendes Tribst, Cornelis Johannes Kleverlaan, Rafael R Moraes, Gabriel Kalil Rocha Pereira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian dental journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rafaela Oliveira PileccoDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7853-5967
Renan Vaz MachryDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais(UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4658-9717
Amanda Maria de Oliveira Dal PivaDepartment of Dental Materials Science, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Universiteit van Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, North Holland, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3844-2053
João Paulo Mendes TribstDepartment of Reconstructive Oral Care, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Universiteit van Amsterdam en Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5412-3546
Cornelis Johannes KleverlaanDepartment of Dental Materials Science, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Universiteit van Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, North Holland, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3218-8031
Rafael R MoraesFaculty of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Pelotas(UFPel), Pelotas, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1358-5928
Gabriel Kalil Rocha PereiraPost-Graduate Program in Oral Sciences (Prosthodontics Unit), Faculty of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria(UFSM), Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9077-9067

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated how different surface treatments affect the bond strength of resin cement to lithium disilicate ceramic subjected to try-in. Lithium disilicate (IPS e.max CAD) slices were randomly assigned to 5 experimental groups based on surface treatment protocols with 5% hydrofluoric acid (HF) and silane (SIL) application timing: HF PRE + SIL POST (HF before and SIL after), HF SIL PRE (both HF and SIL before), HF SIL POST (both HF and SIL after), HF SIL PRE + SIL POST (SIL reapplied after), and HF SIL PRE + HF SIL POST (re-treated). Two control groups were included: CTRL+ (no try-in) and CTRL- (no cleaning step after try-in). Resin cement cylinders (n= 56) were bonded and tested for microshear bond strength after 24 hours (baseline) or after 210 days + 25,000 thermal cycles. At baseline, no significant differences were found. After aging, the re-treated groups had the highest bond strength, while the control groups had the lowest. Intermediate results were observed in HF SIL PRE, HF SIL POST, and HF PRE + SIL POST. Try-in remnants were found on HF SIL PRE, and re-etching led to significant matrix dissolution. Post-try-in silane application created a surface layer on the etched ceramic. Cleaning after try-in is crucial for long-term adhesive behavior, regardless of the surface treatment protocol. Applying silane before try-in acts as a protective layer while reapplying silane after try-in further enhances adhesive stability.

Indexed as

CeramicsDental BondingDental PorcelainResin CementsMaterials TestingSilanesSurface PropertiesDental Porcelainlithia disilicateResin CementsSilanes

Identifiers

PMID40802448
PMCPMC12342116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.