ArticleRevista brasileira de enfermagem2025
Chronic kidney disease patient safety in hemodialysis: evidence of scale validity and reliability.
Article in Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesto analyze evidence of the validity and reliability of the Chronic Kidney Disease Patient Safety Assessment Scale in Hemodialysis Sessions (EASPRCH).
methodsa methodological study with an analysis of validity evidence (content and construct) and reliability (temporal stability, internal consistency, and parameterization). A total of 11 judges and 240 patients from three hemodialysis clinics participated.
resultsthe EASPRCH consists of 15 items distributed across three domains: (1) Strategic Procedures for Error Prevention (6 items), (2) Organizational Processes in Health Management (5 items), and (3) Care Practices for Infection Control (4 items), with scoring available both by domain and overall. The scale has a maximum score of 45 points and a cutoff point (adequate/inadequate) of 34. It achieved a Cronbach's alpha of 0.78 and explained 72.41% of the total variance.
conclusionsthe scale provides evidence of weaknesses or strengths related to specific indicators, which may or may not impact patient safety in hemodialysis care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.