Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40802401›Full record

ArticleRevista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992)2025

The development and evaluation of a microbiota education programme intended for women.

Havva Reyhan Simsek Sira, Ozgenur Hacioglu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Havva Reyhan Simsek SiraKırklareli University, Institute of Health Sciences, Department of Midwifery - Kırklareli, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-9024-0813
Ozgenur HaciogluKırklareli University, Faculty of Health Sciences - Kırklareli, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8223-4737

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveFindings in the literature indicate that women often have incorrect or incomplete knowledge about the concepts of microbiota, microbiome, probiotics, prebiotics, and their relationship with women's health, pregnancy, childbirth methods, and breast milk. In this regard, designing educational programs that contribute to preventing reproductive system infections, achieving positive fertility outcomes, and supporting the health processes of women and newborns through the microbiota of the female body can contribute to the current situation. In line with this aim, in this study, the development and evaluation of a microbiota education program for women were conducted.

methodsThe research was conducted with 151 female participants in a pre-test and post-test, single-group, quasi-experimental design. The trainings were conducted for 2 days, with a total of 4 h for each group, 2 h each day. The microbiota knowledge test applied before the training was repeated as a post-test after 4 weeks. SPSS 25.0 was used for data analysis.

resultsIt was determined that there was a statistically significant difference between the pre-training and post-training knowledge scores of the participants, with the post-training knowledge scores being higher than the pre-training scores (p<0.05). It was found that there was an increase in intra-group means for age, education level, occupation, number of pregnancies, number of births, and method of delivery after the training.

conclusionAs a result of the evaluations, it was concluded that the microbiota education program developed and implemented for women addressed all female participants.

Indexed as

Health EducationHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeMicrobiotaAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansPrebioticsPregnancyProbioticsProgram DevelopmentProgram EvaluationYoung AdultPrebiotics

Identifiers

PMID40802401
PMCPMC12341401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.