Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40802390›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2025

Data Mining-Based Model for Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Autism and Gelotophobia: Mixed Methods Deep Learning Approach.

Mohamed Eldawansy, Hazem El Bakry, Samaa M Shohieb

Expression of concernAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It carries an expression of concern. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mohamed Eldawansy *Information Systems, Faculty of Computers and Information, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-0473-6045
Hazem El Bakry *Information Systems, Faculty of Computers and Information, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-4798-0427
Samaa M Shohieb *Information Systems, Faculty of Computers and Information, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-2832-6171

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGelotophobia, the fear of being laughed at, is a social anxiety condition that affects approximately 6% of neurotypical individuals and up to 45% of those with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). This comorbidity can significantly impair the quality of life, particularly in adolescents with high-functioning ASD, where the prevalence reaches 41.98%. Accurate and automated detection tools could enhance early diagnosis and intervention.

objectiveThis study aimed to develop a deep learning-based diagnostic system that integrates facial emotion recognition with validated questionnaires to detect gelotophobia in individuals with or without ASD.

methodsThe system was trained to identify ASD status using a balanced dataset of 2932 facial images (n=1466; 50% from individuals with ASD and n=1466; 50% from neurotypical individuals). The images were processed using the DeepFace library to extract facial features, which were then used as input for the deep learning classifier. After identifying ASD status, the same images were further analyzed using the pretrained DeepFace model to evaluate facial expressions for signs of gelotophobia. In cases where facial cues were ambiguous, the GELOPH<15> questionnaire, consisting of 15 items, was administered to confirm the diagnosis The system was fully implemented using the Python programming language. Deep learning models were developed using libraries such as PyTorch for training the multilayer perceptron classifier, while CUDA was used to accelerate computations on compatible graphics processing units. Additional libraries from the Python programming language, such as scikit-learn, NumPy, and Pandas, were used for preprocessing, model evaluation, and data manipulation. DeepFace was integrated using its Python application programming interface for facial recognition and emotion classification.

resultsThe dataset comprised 2932 facial images collected from platforms such as Kaggle and ASD-related websites, including 1466 (50%) images of children with ASD and 1466 (50%) images of neurotypical children. The dataset was split into 2653 (90.48%) training samples and 279 (9.51%) testing samples, with each image contributing 100,352 extracted features. We applied various machine learning models for ASD identification. The system achieved an overall prediction accuracy of 92% across both training and testing datasets, with the multilayer perceptron model demonstrating the highest testing accuracy. The system successfully classified gelotophobia in cases where facial expressions were clear. However, in cases of ambiguous facial cues, the DeepFace model alone was insufficient. Incorporating the GELOPH<15> questionnaire improved diagnostic reliability and consistency.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates the effectiveness of combining deep learning techniques with validated diagnostic tools for detecting gelotophobia, particularly in individuals with ASD. The high accuracy achieved highlights the system's potential for clinical and research applications, contributing to the improved understanding and management of gelotophobia among groups considered socially vulnerable. Future research could expand the system's applications to broader psychological assessments.

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum DisorderData MiningDetection AlgorithmsDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedPhobic DisordersChildDeep LearningEmotionsFacial ExpressionFacial RecognitionFemaleHumansLaughterMalePredictive Value of TestsSurveys and Questionnairesartificial intelligenceemotion recognitionfacial expression analysisGELOPH<15>machine learningneurodevelopmental disordersresidual network with 50 layersResNet-50social anxiety

Identifiers

PMID40802390
PMCPMC12391841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.