ArticleCoDAS2025
Phonetic-acoustic and ultrasonographic characteristics of speech after lingual frenectomy: a case report.
Article in CoDAS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This case report aimed to verify the effect of lingual frenectomy on the functional anatomical aspects of the tongue, the phonetic-acoustic characteristics, and the magnitude of tongue movement in the phonemes [ɾ] and [l] after the lingual frenectomy. The anatomical characteristics of the lingual frenum and the functional aspects of the tongue were evaluated using the Protocol for Evaluation of the Lingual Frenum. The phonetic-acoustic particularities of speech were assessed through formant analysis using PRAAT software, and the evaluation of the magnitude of tongue movements was conducted via ultrasonographic analysis with Articulate Assistant Advanced (AAA) software. After the assessments, the patient was referred for the lingual frenectomy and was reevaluated after 7 and 14 days of healing. It was observed through the functional anatomical evaluation that the patient showed modifications in the shape of the tongue tip, greater elevation of the tongue in the oral cavity, and improvement in the contact of the tongue tip with the labial commissures. The acoustic evaluation of speech and the ultrasonographic assessment of tongue movements indicated a longer emission time for the words, increased verticalization and anteriorization of the tongue during speech production, which were more evident for the phoneme [ɾ]. Thus, the instrumental evaluations contributed to the clinical assessment, facilitating the observation of the patient's progress after the lingual frenectomy, identified in the analysis of the formants and highlighted through the ultrasonographic analysis of the tongue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.