ArticleRevista brasileira de enfermagem2025
Construction and validation of an educational booklet on prematurity for pregnant women, postpartum women and family members.
Article in Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesto develop and validate an educational booklet on prematurity for pregnant women, postpartum women, and family members.
methodsa methodological study developed in three stages: preparation of the educational booklet itself; content validation by nurse judges in two stages using a Content Validity Index higher than 0.80 and an agreement rate higher than 90%; and evaluation with the target audience using the Suitability Assessment of Materials.
resultsthe material entitled "My Premature Baby in the Neonatal ICU: a booklet for the family" was developed, addressing topics on care and interventions for premature babies and guidance for families, validated by nurse judges with a Content Validity Index of 0.98 and evaluated with 95.39% of the variables classified as "Very good" by the target audience.
conclusionsthe booklet proved to be representative, didactic, and easy to understand, contributing to the education and health promotion of caregivers of premature babies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.