Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40802293›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de enfermagem2025

Brisbane Burn Scar Impact Profile for children aged less than 8 years cross-cultural adaptation.

Francieli Ferreira de Andrade Batista, Rosângela Aparecida Pimenta, Elisângela Flauzino Zampar, Renne Rodrigues, Elza Hiromi Tokushima Anami, Maria Elena Echevarría-Guanilo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Francieli Ferreira de Andrade BatistaUniversidade Estadual de Londrina. Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1472-3624
Rosângela Aparecida PimentaUniversidade Estadual de Londrina. Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0157-7461
Elisângela Flauzino ZamparUniversidade Estadual de Londrina. Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8090-0591
Renne RodriguesUniversidade Federal da Fronteira Sul. Chapecó, Santa Catarina, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1390-5901
Elza Hiromi Tokushima AnamiUniversidade Estadual de Londrina. Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9054-9037
Maria Elena Echevarría-GuaniloUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianóplolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0505-9258

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesto cross-culturally adapt the Brisbane Burn Scar Impact Profile for Caregivers of Children aged less than 8 years for use in Brazil.

methodsa methodological study, following the stages of translation, synthesis of translations, back-translation, judge committee, pilot test, pre-test and sending of the adapted version for approval by the instrument authors. The Content Validity Index (CVI) was used to assess agreement among judges and to assess the understanding of the instrument among caregivers. For the overall score and dimensions of the instrument, Cronbach's alpha was used.

resultsan CVI ≥0.87 was obtained for each item in the analysis carried out by the expert committee, and in the pilot test, CVI ≥0.80. The overall Cronbach's alpha was 0.94 for all dimensions, except for friendships and social interaction (alpha ≥0.70).

conclusionsthe cross-cultural adaptation presented adequate results, supporting the validity of the translated version.

Indexed as

BurnsCicatrixPsychometricsAdultBrazilChildChild, PreschoolCross-Cultural ComparisonFemaleHumansInfantMaleReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesTranslations

Identifiers

PMID40802293
PMCPMC12334128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.