Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40802158›Full record

ArticleJournal of bioethical inquiry2026

Othering, Stigma, and Normalization: A Key Informant Interview Study on Ethical Issues in Alcohol Policy in Australia.

Mary Jean Walker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bioethical inquiry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mary Jean WalkerLa Trobe University, Bundoora, Melbourne VIC 3086, Australia. mary.walker@latrobe.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-8823-9651

Funding

School of Humanities and Social Sciences, La Trobe University 2021-Start Up Grant-0004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alcohol use causes significant harms and is extensively regulated by governments, but alcohol-related questions are under-explored in public health ethics. To inform future work in this area, I conducted interviews with key informants from alcohol research and policy work in Australia. Thematic analysis of interviews identified a range of ethical issues that can be categorized under six themes: ethical issues in alcohol research; ethical issues raised by judgements about alcohol use; ethical issues raised by alcohol policies; ethical issues in policy processes; ethical questions about policy aims; and ethical issues in how alcohol problems are defined. The study provides direction for future research on problems that are underexplored in the ethics literature. These include problems arising from the influence of industry in alcohol research and policy, the question of how to develop research and policy without generating stigma, and social justice issues connected to alcohol-related stereotypes and judgements.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingPublic HealthPublic PolicySocial JusticeSocial StigmaAustraliaHumansInterviews as TopicAlcoholDrinkingMoralizationNormalizationOtheringPolicy inequalityPolicy targetingStigma

Identifiers

PMID40802158
PMCPMC13068702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.