ArticleUpdates in surgery2025
Short-term outcomes of puncturing forceps-assisted laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernioplasty for indirect inguinal hernia: a prospective randomized study.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to determine the feasibility and safety of using puncturing forceps in totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty (TEP), with a comparative analysis against conventional TEP utilizing standard surgical instruments. 44 male patients with primary indirect inguinal hernia were included, 22 received conventional TEP (CTEP) and the other 22 accepted TEP performed with lightweighted instruments (LTEP). Demographic variables, primary outcomes (operative time, operative complications and postoperative length of hospital stay) and short-term outcomes (recurrence, readmission and reoperation within 30 days) were collected and analyzed. There was no statistically significant difference between the LTEP group and the CTEP group in terms of age, BMI, location of indirect inguinal hernia, and ASA score. The mean operative time of LTEP group was 8.77 mins shorter, but the difference was insignificant (60.32 mins vs. 69.09 mins, P = 0.099). A total of thirteen patients suffered peritoneal punching (5 in LTEP group, 8 in CTEP group). There was no seroma and no injury of the inferior epigastric vessel and vas deferens. Postoperative hospital stays, reoperation, readmission and recurrence were similar during follow-up. LTEP has comparable short-term outcomes to CTEP and the feasibility and safety is confirmed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40802149What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.