ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2025
Biodeterioration of canvas paintings: microbial role and development of sustainable treatments for biocontrol.
Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Filamentous Fungi and the Biodeterioration of Organic Cultural Heritage Materials: A Systematic Review of Mechanisms, Risks, and Preventive Conservation Strategies.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Adhesive Tape Strips and PVA-Borax Hydrogels as Alternative Cleaning Methods to Remove Fungal Proliferation on Canvas Support of Paintings.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biodeterioration of paintings, caused by microorganisms interacting with the organic/inorganic compounds of the canvas, represents a serious problem for preserving cultural heritage. In our study, the microbial degradation caused on an eighteenth century painting "Sant'Anna, San Gioacchino e la Vergine Bambina" was investigated. Seventeen bacterial and six fungal strains on the altered parts of the canvas were identified, and their deteriorating ability were evaluated on two pictorial pigments: the yellow ochre and the ivory black. We recognized that microorganisms interacted with these pigments and modified their chromatic features. Furthermore, we adopted an eco-friendly antimicrobial treatment based on natural plant extracts (thymus, rosemary, and garlic) as an alternative to conventional biocides and highlighted how rosemary (Salvia rosmarinus) extract was the best and inhibited 74% of the isolated bacterial strains. When the extract was applied on the contaminated canvas, it reduced bacterial colonization by ~ 75% in only 48 h and eliminated the fungi within 7 days. The extract application was optimized, to minimize potential alterations of the painting caused by the extract, by adopting different strategies: (i) direct nebulization, (ii) Evolon® tissue (an innovative technical polyester-polyamide textile), and (iii) pretreatment with cyclomethicone D5. Finally, we also verified that it did not cause chromatic variations on the canvas confirming its suitability for conservation purposes. Our study provides new insights on the role of microorganisms in the deterioration of cultural heritage and highlights the potentiality of plant-based antimicrobials as sustainable, non-invasive, and alternative to traditional methods for the artwork preservation. Future research should focus on long-term efficacy assessments and formulation optimization to enhance applicability in heritage conservation practices. KEY POINTS: • Identification of 17 bacteria and 6 fungi from a deteriorate canvas painting • Microorganisms altered yellow ochre and ivory black, causing chromatic changes • Rosemary extract applied on canvas reduced microbial colonization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.