ArticleBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2025
Mechanobiology of gastric needle insertions: a combined experimental and numerical study.
Article in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rising use of biologic drugs has increased the demand for alternative gastric administration methods. Inception of devices engineered to insert medication into the mucosal lining overcomes limitations of traditional administration methods. Mechanical forces from such microneedle insertions can affect tissue and cellular behavior, particularly mechanotransduction markers. This study investigates the effects of needle insertion in gastric tissue to inform the design of alternative drug delivery devices. Experimental and computational approaches were utilized, using tension and radial compression tests on porcine gastric tissue to inform a finite element analysis (FEA) model. This model was validated with atomic force microscopy (AFM)-based micro-indentation to examine stiffness variations near the insertion site, and yes-associated-protein-1 (YAP-1) expression was analyzed to assess cellular mechanotransduction. AFM results revealed a distance-dependent decrease in tissue stiffness from the insertion site (p < 0.05), with significant differences in needle geometry (p < 0.05). The FEA model correlated well with AFM findings, confirming its validity for further cellular simulations. Mechanical stresses from needle insertion were shown to propagate through the tissue, affecting both cytoplasmic and nuclear stress distributions and altering nuclear morphology near the insertion site. The blunt needle produced a higher localized stress field compared to the sharp needle. Additionally, YAP-1 expression was lower in the injected samples than in control samples showing distance-dependent responses observed. This study demonstrates a validated model linking tissue mechanics and cellular responses, highlighting how needle geometry impacts gastric tissue mechanics and mechanotransduction, providing insights essential for designing gastric drug delivery devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.