Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40802035›Full record

ArticleBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2025

Mechanobiology of gastric needle insertions: a combined experimental and numerical study.

Sif Julie Friis, Torben Strøm Hansen, Mette Poulsen, Peter Helding Kvist, Ansgar Petersen, Hans Gregersen, Jens Vinge Nygaard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sif Julie FriisDepartment of Biological and Chemical Engineering, Aarhus University, Gustav Wieds vej 10, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7171-2599
Torben Strøm HansenDevice and Delivery Solutions, Novo Nordisk A/S, Hilleroed, Denmark.
Mette PoulsenAlternative Delivery Technologies, Device and Delivery Solutions, Novo Nordisk A/S, Hilleroed, Denmark.
Peter Helding KvistSafety Pharmacology and Early Toxicology, Novo Nordisk A/S, Maaloev, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0189-992X
Ansgar PetersenBerlin Institute of Health at Charité, BIH Center for Regenerative Therapies, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3075-4300
Hans GregersenCalifornia Medical Innovations Institute, San Diego, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5792-2845
Jens Vinge NygaardDepartment of Biological and Chemical Engineering, Aarhus University, Gustav Wieds vej 10, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark. jvn@bce.au.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2442-1443

Funding

Innovationsfonden 9065- 00258 A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rising use of biologic drugs has increased the demand for alternative gastric administration methods. Inception of devices engineered to insert medication into the mucosal lining overcomes limitations of traditional administration methods. Mechanical forces from such microneedle insertions can affect tissue and cellular behavior, particularly mechanotransduction markers. This study investigates the effects of needle insertion in gastric tissue to inform the design of alternative drug delivery devices. Experimental and computational approaches were utilized, using tension and radial compression tests on porcine gastric tissue to inform a finite element analysis (FEA) model. This model was validated with atomic force microscopy (AFM)-based micro-indentation to examine stiffness variations near the insertion site, and yes-associated-protein-1 (YAP-1) expression was analyzed to assess cellular mechanotransduction. AFM results revealed a distance-dependent decrease in tissue stiffness from the insertion site (p < 0.05), with significant differences in needle geometry (p < 0.05). The FEA model correlated well with AFM findings, confirming its validity for further cellular simulations. Mechanical stresses from needle insertion were shown to propagate through the tissue, affecting both cytoplasmic and nuclear stress distributions and altering nuclear morphology near the insertion site. The blunt needle produced a higher localized stress field compared to the sharp needle. Additionally, YAP-1 expression was lower in the injected samples than in control samples showing distance-dependent responses observed. This study demonstrates a validated model linking tissue mechanics and cellular responses, highlighting how needle geometry impacts gastric tissue mechanics and mechanotransduction, providing insights essential for designing gastric drug delivery devices.

Indexed as

BiophysicsNeedlesStomachAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaFinite Element AnalysisMechanotransduction, CellularMicroscopy, Atomic ForceModels, BiologicalStress, MechanicalSwineYAP-Signaling ProteinsYAP-Signaling ProteinsDrug delivery deviceGastric tissue mechanicsMechanobiologyNeedle insertionNumerical analysesYAP-1

Identifiers

PMID40802035
PMCPMC12454536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.