Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40802034›Full record

ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2025

Synthetic film-based testing of film quality assurance software accuracy.

O Kamst, D Firth

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

O KamstGenesisCare, Southport, Australia. okamst@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4044-1754
D FirthGenesisCare, Southport, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Film quality assurance software is an integral component of patient-specific quality assurance for various radiation techniques where high degrees of geometrical and dosimetric accuracy are required. Evaluating the accuracy of film quality assurance software products has relied on various techniques ranging from comparative analyses, measurements with phantoms and other detectors, along with confidence from industry-standard peer reviews. The aim of this work was to determine if a series of synthetically created film and DICOM images can be used to test the accuracy of certain patient specific quality assurance metrics used in film quality assurance software packages. The synthetic images have been engineered to simulate radiographic film scanned TIFF images and treatment planning system exported DICOM files. Each pair of images were designed to test a particular component of the software's ability to process curve fitting, dosimetric differences, distance to agreement, percentage threshold and gamma analysis. It was found that synthetic film could simulate radiographic scanned films and treatment planning system DICOM planes and provide the physicist with empirical data on the accuracy of the mentioned metrics. The series of tests also assisted the physicist in identifying optimal calibration models, validating geometric and dosimetric variations, and offering insights into potential differences in lower dose penumbras.

Indexed as

Film DosimetryQuality Assurance, Health CareSoftwareCalibrationHumansPhantoms, ImagingQuality Control

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.