ArticleEcoHealth2026
Assessment of Hygiene and Biosecurity Practices of Wet Market Stalls in Punjab (India).
Article in EcoHealth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wet markets have been implicated in the outbreak of recent pandemics like Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), H5N1 avian influenza, and most recently, COVID-19. In view of the wet markets as a potential source of spillover, our study aimed to assess hygiene, sanitation, and biosecurity practices in wet markets across Punjab, a state in India. A total of 60 wet market stalls from three different regions of Punjab were subjected to analysis through participatory and observational survey using 45 questions covering 12 parameters. A quantitative assessment scoring system was developed as per the guidelines of World Health Organization (WHO) which was used to evaluate the wet market stalls. Among the 60 wet market stalls that were assessed, 13 (21.67%) of them were categorized as having poor hygiene, sanitation and biosecurity practices. 39 (65%) stalls were classified as having moderate practices, and 8 (13.33%) stalls were observed to follow good hygiene and biosecurity measures. None of the stalls were found to have excellent practices, emphasizing the need for continuous efforts to elevate hygiene and biosecurity standards in these wet markets. Educational campaigns and agency coordination, such as with Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) and municipal bodies, are essential for licensing wet market stalls. Emphasizing cleanliness, protective gear provision, and zoning can improve hygiene and reduce disease risks, protecting public health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40802022What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.