Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40802000›Full record

ReviewJournal of religion and health2025

Embryological Insights in Ancient Scriptures and Religious Texts: A Comparative Review.

Farhana Sultana Karim, Satyapriya Maharana

Abstract readReviewHistorical ArticleComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of religion and health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Farhana Sultana KarimDepartment of Yoga and Life Science, S-VYASA University, Prashanti Kutiram, Vivekananda Road, Kalluballu Post, Anekal, Jigani, Bengaluru, 560105, India. fsk.svyasa@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2010-8719
Satyapriya MaharanaDepartment of Yoga and Life Science, S-VYASA University, Prashanti Kutiram, Vivekananda Road, Kalluballu Post, Anekal, Jigani, Bengaluru, 560105, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Embryology, the study of fetal development, gained scientific recognition in the nineteenth century. However, ancient scriptures from diverse religious beliefs-Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism, Christianity, Judaism, and Islam-provide detailed descriptions of fetal development, maternal care, and ethical considerations long before the establishment of modern embryology. These texts also emphasized the need for respect from the earliest stage of an embryo. While modern embryology has made significant advances in understanding fetal development and congenital anomalies, the question of when human life begins remains debated among scientists, ethicists, philosophers, and theologians, with viewpoints ranging from fertilization to birth and beyond. This review explores the embryological narratives found in ancient religious texts and compares them with contemporary scientific findings. By comparing the embryological narratives found in texts such as the Garbha Upanishads, Garbhāvakrāntisūtra, Garbhāvakrāntisūtra, Tandulaveyāliya, Torah, Bible, and Quran, it provides an analysis of how different cultures and religions perceived the development of life, inception, and development. By highlighting the intersection of tradition and modernity, the study underscores the evolving understanding of human development across time and disciplines.

Indexed as

EmbryologyReligion and MedicineHistory, AncientHumansAncient scripturesEmbryologyEthical perspectivesFetal development

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.