ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2025
Disease patterns and entities in adult liver consult cases highlight challenging areas in diagnostic hepatopathology practice.
Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Difficult liver pathology cases often require expert review for optimal patient care. We reviewed consult cases received in our reference centre aiming to highlight challenging areas in hepatopathology that may benefit from specialist consultation and focused educational activities. We included all primary liver consult cases received between 10/2016 and 12/2022. Data on the sender and aetiology for consultation were collected. Initial and consult reports were screened for adequacy of clinical information, stains performed, final diagnosis and disease grading/staging. We retrieved 219 liver consults, 187 submitted by hepatologists. For medical cases, most common initial diagnoses were non-specific changes, chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis without underlying aetiology. Most common consult diagnoses were vascular disease, primary biliary cholangitis and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (p < 0.001). Major change in initial diagnosis was noted in 72 (49%), minor change in 38 (25.9%) and no change in 23 (15.6%) cases. For focal liver lesions (n = 72), most common initial diagnoses were hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), non-specific or metastatic. Most common consult diagnoses were HCC, cholangiocarcinoma or non-neoplastic liver (p = 0.033). Major change in initial diagnosis was noted in 30 (41.7%), minor change in 24 (33.3%) and no change in 15 (20.8%) cases. Study of liver consult patterns provides useful information on areas of hepatopathology posing diagnostic difficulty. Most challenging fields are vascular liver disease, interpretation of hepatitic pattern, primary cholangiopathy and classification and subtyping of hepatocellular tumours. These areas can be the subject for future medical educational activities in hepatopathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.