ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2025
Standardized Corneal Topography-Driven AI for Orthokeratology Fitting: A Hybrid Deep/Machine Learning Approach With Enhanced Generalizability.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Orbscan IIz multimodal corneal topography dataset of anterior axial power maps with structured clinical parameters for unsupervised and self-supervised representation learning.Data in brief · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Application in Cornea and External Diseases.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The role of anterior segment biomarkers in the development and progression of myopia.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
- A narrative review on orthokeratology for myopia control: Lens design, combination therapies, and clinical management.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop a standardized artificial intelligence (AI) system integrating corneal topography images and numerical parameters for optimizing orthokeratology (OK) lens fitting. Methods: Retrospective data from 1153 patients (2341 eyes) with Euclid OK lenses were analyzed. Five hundred nineteen eyes (393 patients) with treatment zone decentration ≤1 mm were included for model training. A device-agnostic corneal topography reconstruction pipeline generated standardized tangential curvature maps. A hybrid model combined deep learning (ResNet for image features) and machine learning (using numerical parameters) to predict alignment curve (AC) and cylinder power (CP), with numerical regression for AC and classification regression for CP. Multitask learning addressed AC-CP biomechanical coupling. Results: Numerical parameter-based models achieved optimal axial AC prediction (mean absolute error [MAE] = 0.290, R2 = 0.917), and CP prediction (accuracy [ACC] = 0.798, area under the curve [AUC] = 0.791). The image-based deep learning model using baseline corneal topography alone attained acceptable AC prediction (MAE = 0.248, R2 = 0.850), yet demonstrated suboptimal CP classification accuracy (ACC = 0.674, AUC = 0.621). Hybrid modeling achieved breakthrough performance in AC prediction (MAE = 0.136, R2 = 0.973) and superior CP classification (ACC = 0.898, AUC = 0.896). Conclusions: This system standardizes corneal topography across devices, addressing a critical barrier to generalizability in existing AI models, significantly enhancing fitting precision and generalizability for myopia control applications. Translational Relevance: The device-agnostic design in the present study allows seamless integration into diverse clinical settings. The hybrid AI framework achieves near-expert accuracy, offering a scalable solution to access to high-quality OK lens fitting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.