ReviewNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Nanoparticle Uptake and Crossing by Human In Vitro Models of Intestinal Barriers: A Scoping Review.
Review in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Developing a New Approach Methodology Framework to Assess Biological Responses to Nanoplastics: Insights from Polystyrene and Biodegradable Particles.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Use of organ-on-chip devices and single particle ICP-MS for assessing dynamic in vitro bioavailability of silver and titanium dioxide nanoparticles from foodstuff.Mikrochimica acta · 2026Article
- Pathways, Mechanisms, and Therapeutic Strategies of Neurotoxicity Induced by Micro- and Nanoplastics.Brain sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Caco-2 in vitro model of the intestinal barrier is a well-established system for the investigation of the intestinal fate of orally ingested chemicals and drugs, and it has been used for over ten years by pharmaceutical industries as a model for absorption in preclinical studies. The Caco-2 model shows a fair correlation with in vivo drug absorption, though some inherent biases remain unresolved. Its main limitation lies in the lack of structural complexity, as it does not replicate the diverse cell types and mucus layer present in the human intestinal epithelium. Consequently, the development of advanced in vitro models of the intestinal barrier, that more structurally resemble the human intestinal epithelium physiology, has increased the potential applications of these models. Recently, Caco-2-based advanced intestinal models have proven effective in predicting nanomaterial uptake and transport across the intestinal barrier. The aim of this review is to provide a state-of-the-art of human in vitro intestinal barrier models for the study of translocation/uptake of nanoparticles relevant for oral exposure, including inorganic nanomaterials, micro/nano plastic, and fiber nanomaterials. The main effects of the above-mentioned nanomaterials on the intestinal barrier are also reported.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.