ReviewNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Quantum Dot-Enabled Biosensing for Prostate Cancer Diagnostics.
Review in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineering Multimodal Nanomaterials for Prostate Cancer Theranostics: Design Principles, Recent Advances, and Translational Challenges.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Multifunctional Nanoplatforms Bridging Diagnostics and Therapeutics in Cancer.Micromachines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prostate cancer diagnostics are rapidly advancing through innovations in nanotechnology, biosensing strategies, and molecular recognition. This review analyzes studies focusing on quantum dot (QD)-based biosensors for detecting prostate cancer biomarkers with high sensitivity and specificity. It covers diverse sensing platforms and signal transduction mechanisms, emphasizing the influence of the QD composition, surface functionalization, and bio interface engineering on analytical performance. Key metrics such as detection limits, dynamic range, and compatibility with biological samples, including serum, urine, and tissue, are critically assessed. Recent advances in green-synthesized QDs and smartphone-integrated diagnostic platforms are highlighted, including lateral flow assays, paper-based devices, and pH-responsive hydrogels for real-time, low-cost, and decentralized cancer screening. These innovations enable multiplexed biomarker detection and tumor microenvironment monitoring in point-of-care settings. This review concludes by addressing the current limitations, scalability challenges, and future research directions for translating QD-enabled biosensors into clinically viable diagnostic tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.